whether, within the current legal framework, legislation exists that permits the application of the military criminal jurisdiction to civilians. c) Other aspects of the judgment 23. Concerning the payments ordered for Anne Ellen Steward Orlandini, pursuant to the provisions of paragraphs 242 and 243 of the judgment delivered in this case, in February 2010, the representatives advised that “Mr. Palamara Iribarne had confirmed [to them] his willingness to deliver this amount to Mrs. Steward Orlandini.” The representatives have not forwarded any further information on this point. 24. The Court considers it important to indicate that, since February 2010, the representatives have not forwarded any further information on their client’s compliance with the payments to Mrs. Steward Orlandini. In this regard, the Court finds it pertinent to reiterate the provisions of the judgment and of the orders on monitoring compliance in this case,13 that Mr. Palamara Iribarne must pay “Anne Ellen Steward Orlandini the necessary amount to compensate her for her expenses.”14 Consequently, the Court requires the representatives to submit recent information on this point in order to verify whether Mr. Palamara Iribarne has in fact complied with the payment of the amount owed to Mrs. Steward Orlandini. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercise of its authority to monitor compliance with its decisions in accordance with Articles 33, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 67, and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, 25(1) and 30 of its Statute, and 31(2) and 69 of its Rules of Procedure, 15 DECLARES THAT: 1. It will keep open the procedure of monitoring compliance with the following aspects of this case that are pending: a) To adopt, within a reasonable period, all the measures necessary to repeal and amend domestic laws that are incompatible with international standards on 13 Cf. Case of Palamara Iribarne v. Chile, supra note 7, para. 242; Case of Palamara Iribarne v. Chile. Monitoring compliance with judgment. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of November 30, 2007, thirty-eighth considering paragraph, and Case of Palamara Iribarne v. Chile, supra note 5, twenty-fourth considering paragraph. 14 15 2009. Cf. Case of Palamara Iribarne, supra note 7, para. 242. Rules of Procedure of the Court approved at its eight-fifth regular session held from November 16 to 28, 9