difficulties to take the pertinent actions, for instance, they "could not obtain the certificates from the National Registry of Individuals [RENAP] since the books had been destroyed or are badly preserved"; some of them cannot remedy the loss of such certificates since they lack "the documents and transcripts required" so that the Attorney General’s Office [PGN] may order the “untimely entry” and, “for several months now, they have been waiting for the [Attorney General's Office] to deliver its decision within the framework of several probate proceedings conducted". 21. The Inter-American Commission sustained that "in view of the difficulties faced in order to obtain official identity documents, the State must provide active support from its institutions”. 22. Based on the foregoing, the representatives and the Inter-American Commission did not contest the information presented by the State regarding the new payments of the compensatory amounts made. However, in view of said information, this Court notes that the payments corresponding to the compensations ordered in favor of five victims, indicated by the State in its report of February 28, 2012, had been already mentioned in previous State’s communications; for which they were considered by the Court upon issuance of its Order of July 6, 2011.13 23. This Court values the efforts made by the State to pay the compensatory amounts for non-pecuniary damage ordered in favor of 13 more victims14 and considers said payments to be fulfilled. Moreover, the Court notes that of a total of 155 victims in respect of whom it ordered the payment of compensations, to date, the State has complied with the payment in favor of 134 of them. 24. Moreover, from the information provided by the parties and the Commission (supra eighteenth to twenty-first considering paragraphs), this Court notes that the State has still not paid the amounts corresponding to the compensations established in favor of 21 victims, namely: Luciana Cabrera Galeano, María Menegilda Marroquín Miranda15, María Vicenta Moral Solís, Enriqueta González G. de Martínez16, Eugenia Jiménez Pineda, Felicita Lima Ayala, Sara Pérez López, Telma Guadalupe Aldana Canan, Tomasa Galicia González, Nicolasa Pérez Méndez, Ever Ismael Antonio Coto, Héctor Coto, Santos Osorio Lique, Jorge Granados Cardona, Rafael Barrientos Mazariegos, Ángel Cermeño Pineda, Augusto Mayen Ramírez17, Marcelino Deras 13 The Court has vertified that, according to the corresponding entries, presented by Guatemala as documentation attached to its communication of July 4, 2011, Mrs. Valeria Garcia received the respective payment on December 27, 2010, as well as Mr. Juan de Dios Cabrera Ruano, Rodrigo Mayen Ramirez and Oscar Adelso Antonio Jimenez and that Mrs. Luz Castillo Flores, in turn, received it on April 7, 2011. Therefore, in the Order of the Court of July 6, 2011, it was concluded that the State has complied with the payment of the compensations in favor of said persons (Cf. Case of “Las Dos Erres” Massacre v. Guatemala. Monitoring Compliance with Judgment. Order of the Court of July 6, 2011, fiftieth considering paragraph and second declarative paragraph). 14 Namely: Dionicio Campos Rodriguez (in the judgment, his name was indicated as “Dionisio”), José Ramiro Gomez Hernández, Israel Portillo Perez, Ladislao Jimenez Pernillo, Mira Elizabeth Aldana Canan, Felipa de Jesus Medrano Perez, Leonarda Falla Sazo (in the judgment, her last name was indicated as "Saso Hernandez"), Maria Luisa Corado, Inés Otilio Rodriguez Pernillo, Abelina Flores, Toribia Ruano Castillo, Maria Dolores Romero Ramirez and Andres Rivas. 15 The State referred to her as “María Meregilda Marroquin Miranda”, supra note 11. 16 The State referred to her as “Enriqueta González Gomez”, supra note 13. 17 The State referred to him as “Agusto Mayen Ramirez", supra note 13. 7