8 ii. iii. iv. d) medications prescribed by the doctors and Mrs. Benavides has had to pay the costs of the medications; The State cannot establish any restriction or limitation on the medications it will supply for medical treatment, as that treatment must include all the medications considered necessary; If the medications are not in stock in the State hospitals, then their cost must be defrayed or reimbursed by the Ministry of Health, and They requested that the Court call upon the State to take full charge of Mrs. Benavides Lopez’ medical treatment, which has to include all the medications that her physicians prescribe, either by reimbursing the cost of the medication or through some other mechanism that ensures that the State pays the full cost. Concerning the measures needed to render the judgment of conviction null and void, i. ii. iii. iv. e) The decision of the National Chamber on Terrorism was not reported to either the victim or to his representatives; The decision of that Chamber disregards what the Court ordered: while it is true that the pardon prevents execution of the guilty verdict, by the time the Court issued its Judgment on reparations Mr. Cantoral had already been pardoned and this did not stop the Court from ordering the State to render the conviction null and void. Irrespective of whether Mr. Cantoral was pardoned, a judgment based on laws that violate the Convention cannot have effects in law and must be nullified; They contend that the State has not complied with this point, and They request that the Court order the State to render null and void, by means of a court decision to that effect, the judgment of conviction entered against Mr. Cantoral, as it was delivered on the basis of a law that was in violation of the American Convention. Concerning the grant to pursue a higher education, i. The Ministry of Justice sent a letter to the Rector of the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos in which he requested that Mr. Cantoral be automatically admitted to the Law School, and that he be fully exempt from the fees for administrative and academic costs. The Secretary General of the University answered by stating that this manner of admission was improper, as applicants had to conform to university law and to the rules for admissions. The Secretary suggested that an item be included in the institutional budget for a fellowship program to cover the costs incurred in pursuing a university degree once the interested party is admitted. Neither the victim nor his mother was informed of those communications;