12 n) A photostat copy of Article 24 of the Judiciary Statute; o) Official memorandum No. 7220-98, dated September 3, 1998, on the official exchange rate between the Peruvian currency and the United States dollar from January 1990 to June 1998, issued by the head of the Department of Economic Statistics and Studies of the Office of the Superintendent of Banking and Insurance; p) Supreme Decree No. 069-85-PCM, dated July 26, 1985, published in "El Peruano" on July 27, 1985; q) A photostat copy of Decree-Law No. 22,482 of March 27, 1979, on the "maternity and nursing subsidies currently in effect"; r) A photostat copy of Decree-Law No. 18.846, dated April 28, 1971, on "Jobrelated Accidents"; s) Law No. 24.993, of January 19, 1989, published in "El Peruano" on January 21, 1989, whereby the "Peruvian Sociologists Association is created"; t) Life expectancy chart for the 1990-1995 five-year period, broken down by sex, published in the document titled "Proyecciones de Población del Peru 1995-2025" (Peruvian population forecasts 1995-2025), official memorandum No. 199-98-INEI/DTDES, dated August 18, 1998, from the head of the National Institute of Statistics and Informatics; u) Certification issued by the Office of Remunerations and Benefits of the Office of Personnel of the "Ministry of the Interior" on a sociologist’s salary at that agency as of September 1998; and v) Urgent Decree 074-97, dated July 31, 1997, published in "El Peruano" on August 3, 1997, on the minimum lifetime remuneration of workers in the private sector in Peru. 33. The Commission and the victim’s next of kin made no objections to the documents submitted by the State. * * * OTHER EVIDENCE 34. On April 29, 1998, the victim’s next of kin reported that given the request made by the President (supra 11) and "the limited means they had to produce the evidence, " the victim’s next of kin would not be deposed before the Court and would instead submit sworn affidavits and expert psychological reports prepared in Peru and in the Netherlands. The victim’s next of kin submitted those documents on June 4, 1998 (supra 15). 35. On July 20, 1998, the State filed two briefs objecting to the sworn affidavits submitted by the victim’s next of kin and the report prepared by the psychological expert (supra 18). It argued that submission of the documents in question was in violation of articles 46 and 47 of the Rules of Procedure, as it left "our side … unable