9 “requested from competent authorities […] all the information […] concerning such incidents, as well as […] information on the measures actually taken to both safeguard the safety and physical integrity of [Mr.] Salinas, and […] to investigate the said reported threats.” On January 20, 2006, the State submitted the original report along with its exhibits. 42. The submission of January 24, 2006, wherein the Inter-American Commission stated that “owing to the importance of the Exhibit [that was missing in the State’s report] for a correct assessment of the progress on the implementation process of [said] provisional measures, the Commission understands that the term within which the Commission must file its observations shall commence on the date said exhibit is forwarded.” On January 25, 2006, following the instructions of its President, the Secretariat informed the representative and the Commission of a 10-day extension next following the date of expiration of the original terms of four and six weeks, respectively, for them to file their observations to said Sate reports. 43. The submission of February 1, 2006, wherein the State reported the death of inmate Federico Alberto Minatti. On the same day, the representatives reported said death and submitted information about the implementation of provisional measures. 44. The submission of February 1, 2006, wherein the State reported “the incidents of violence that had taken place at Units No. 4 on […] December 12, 2005,” in respect of which the State informed of the measures and actions taken by the Penitentiary Board. Furthermore, the State referred to “the situation associated with the threats sustained by Pablo Salinas, María Angélica Escayola and Alfredo Guevara,” in respect of which the State claimed that “both [Mr.] Pablo Salinas and his colleagues have been awarded adequate protection by the authorities and immediate and useful actions were taken so as to identify the aggressors.” 45. The Order of the Court of February 7, 2006, summoning the Inter-American Commission, the representatives of the beneficiaries of the provisional measures and the State to a public hearing to be held in the city of Brasilia, Brazil, at the seat of the Superior Tribunal of Justice of said country, on March 30, 2006, so that the Court could hear their arguments on the facts and circumstances relating to the implementation of said measures. 46. The submissions of February 14 and 16, 2006, wherein the representatives filed information about inmate Ricardo Vilca, who “was found [severely] injured within the same cellblock where a few days before [inmate Federico Alberto] Minatti had been found dead.” 47. The submission of February 21, 2006, wherein the State requested an extension of time for the submission of its eighth State’s report. The extension due date was set for March 17, 2006. 48. The submissions of February 27, 2006, in which the representatives filed a “copy of the [alleged] habeas corpus filed owing to the incidents that had taken place in the cellblock for juvenile adults” of the De Boulonge Sur Mer Correctional Institution, as well as copy of the “Order [passed by the jail oversight judge] in the proceedings identified with No. 8732 – Habeas Corpus – Cellblock No.2, Mendoza Provincial Prison.”