CEJIL

- Library
- Sign in

Previous 83 / 83 Next

Normal view

8 monitoring execution of the judgment. Roberto Figueiredo Caldas Jugde ad hoc Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Uwazi is developed by
CEJIL
Library
Login

Info
18Relationships

Search Tips

Search text

Type something in the search box to get some results.

I INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE AND PURPOSE OF THE DISPUTE 1
II PROCEEDING BEFORE THE COURT3
III PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS 4
A) Failure of the representatives to comply with the time limit established in the Rules of Procedure to submit the brief with pleadings and motions and its attachments 4
B) Impossibility of alleging violations that were not considered during the proceedings before the Inter-American Commission 6
C) Failure to exhaust domestic judicial remedies 8
C.1) Mandado de segurança 9
C.2) Criminal proceedings and the “fourth instance formula” 11
C.3) Failure to exhaust domestic remedies in relation to the right to freedom of association 13
C.4) Failure to exhaust domestic remedies in relation to Article 11 of the American Convention – civil actions 14
IV JURISDICTION 15
V EVIDENCE 15
A. Evidence presented by the representatives in their pleadings and motions brief 16
B. Documentary, testimonial and expert evidence 18
C. Assessment of the evidence 20
VI DETERMINATION OF THE PRESUMED VICTIMS 22
VII ARTICLE 11 (RIGHT TO PRIVACY [HONOR AND DIGNITY]) IN RELATION TO ARTICLE 1(1) (OBLIGATION TO RESPECT RIGHTS) OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION 23
1) Facts of the instant case 24
1(i) Interception and dissemination of the telephone conversations25
1(ii) Legal actions and normative framework 29
2) The right to privacy, honor and reputation 31
2(i) Private life and interception and recording of telephone conversations 32
2(ii) Privacy, honor and reputation, and dissemination of the telephone conversations 40
VIII ARTICLE 16 (FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION) IN RELATION TO ARTICLE 1(1) (OBLIGATION TO RESPECT RIGHTS) OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION 45
IX ARTICLES 8(1) (RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL) AND 25(1) (RIGHT TO JUDICIAL PROTECTION) IN RELATION TO ARTICLE 1(1) (OBLIGATION TO RESPECT RIGHTS) OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION 50
1) Mandado de segurança 54
2) Criminal jurisdiction 55
3) Administrative procedure 56
4) Civil proceedings57
X ARTICLE 28 (FEDERAL CLAUSE) IN RELATION TO ARTICLES 1(1) AND 2 OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION 58
XI REPARATIONS 60
A) Injured party 61
B) Compensation 61
C) Measures of satisfaction and guarantees of non-repetition 64
D) Costs and Expenses 66
E) Means of complying with the payments ordered 67
XII OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 68
CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE SERGIO GARCÍA RAMÍREZ72
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AD HOC ROBERTO DE FIGUEIREDO CALDAS76

Escher y otros. Judgment. July 6, 2009

IACourt judgment

Preview

Type

Costs
Merits
Preliminary Objections
Reparations

Date: Jul 6, 2009

Mechanism

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Number: C-200

Country

Brazil

Signatories

Cecilia Medina Quiroga
Diego García-Sayán
Leonardo A. Franco
Manuel E. Ventura Robles
Margarette May Macaulay
Rhadys Abreu Blondet
Roberto de Figueiredo Caldas
Sergio García Ramírez

Separate vote

Roberto de Figueiredo Caldas
Sergio García Ramírez

Primary Documents

Escher et al. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment. July 6, 2009.pdf
English
Download View
Escher e outros. Exceções Preliminares, Mérito, Reparações e Custas. Sentença de 6 de julho de 2009.pdf
Portuguese
Download View
Escher y otros. Excepciones Preliminares, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 6 de julio de 2009.pdf
Spanish
Download View

Supporting files

Escher e outros. Exceçoēs Preliminares, Mérito, Reparaçoēs e Custas. Sentença de 6 julho 2009.doc4.65 MB

Escher et al. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment. July 6, 2009.doc546.82 kB

Escher y otros. Excepciones Preliminares, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 6 de julio de 2009.doc566.78 kB

No References

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

Signatories8
- Judge and/or Commissioners8
Signatory Separate Vote2
- Judge and/or Commissioners2
País1
- Country1
Mecanismo1
- Mechanism1
No Label1
- Case1
IACourt Documents3
- Order of the IACourt2
- Order of the President IACHR1
Separate Votes2
- Separate vote2

Create Reference

Select relationship type

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Search Tips

Connect to a paragraph

Connect to an entity

Disable highlights

Add to table of contents

Notifications

You're all caught up

New activity will show up here.