ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS1 OF NOVEMBER 24, 2010 CASE OF THE DISMISSED CONGRESSIONAL EMPLOYEES (Aguado Alfaro and others) v. PERU MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT AND REQUEST FOR PROVISIONAL MEAURES HAVING SEEN: A) Monitoring compliance with Judgment The Judgment on preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs (hereinafter “the Judgment”) issued by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Court,” “the Inter-American Court” or “the Tribunal”) of November 24, 2006, in the case of the Dismissed Congressional Workers v. Peru. 1. 2. The interpretation request for the Judgment, presented by one of the representatives of the victims, and declared inadmissible by the Inter-American Court on November 30, 2007, as it did not comply with Article 67 of the Convention and Articles 29(3) and 59 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court that were in force at that time.2 3. The Order of the then-President of the Court of June 8, 2009, through which it was decided to call a private hearing at the Court’s headquarters so that the Tribunal could obtain information from the Republic of Peru (hereinafter “the State” or “Peru”) about the reparation measures ordered in the Judgment and the respective observations of the InterAmerican Commission and the common intervening parties. 4. The hearing held on July 8, 2009, during the LXXXIII Ordinary Period of Sessions of the Tribunal at its headquarters3, as well as the documents presented by the Commission and the State during the hearing. 5. The Order issued on November 20, 2009, by which the Tribunal declared: 1 Judge Diego Garcia-Sayan, because of his Peruvian nationality, did not participate in the deliberation and signing of this Order, pursuant to Article 19 of the Statute and Article 19 of the Rules of the Court. Consequently, for the purposes of monitoring compliance with the Judgment in the present case, the Vice President of the Tribunal, Judge Leonardo A. Franco, acted as President-in-Office. 2 Case of the Dismissed Congressional Workers (Aguado Alfaro and others). v. Peru. Request for Interpretation of Judgment of Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 30, 2007. Series C No. 174. 3 Mr. Francisco Ercilio Moura and Mr. Javier Mujica Petit, from the Centro de Asesoría Laboral del Perú [Labour Advisory Centre of Peru] (CEDAL), atended this audience along with the common intervenors of the representatives: for the Comission, Mrs. Lilly Ching Soto (Adviser); and, for the State, Delia Muñoz Muñoz (Specialized Supranational Public Prosecutor), Rodolfo Reyna Salinas (Advisor to the President of Congress), Mr. Edgar Chauca Lopez (Head of Legal Congress), Mrs. Erika Ramos Arteaga (Advisor to the Specialized Supranational Public Prosecutor), Ambassador Moises Valley Tambini de Valle (Head of the Diplomatic Mission of Peru to Costa Rica), and Mr. Gustavo Lembcke and Mr. David Tejada, Minister and Second Secretary of the Embassy of Peru in Costa Rica, respectively.