131 (Obligation to Respect Rights) thereof, who are indicated in Appendix II of this judgment; (c) The fifty-nine (59) persons who lost their possession in El Aro, who are indicated in Appendix III of this judgment, as victims of the violation of Articles 5 (Right to Humane Treatment) and 21 (Right to Property) of the Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) (Obligation to Respect Rights) thereof; (d) The forty-three (43) persons whose homes were destroyed in El Aro, who are indicated in Appendix III of this judgment, as victims of the violation of Articles 5 (Right to Humane Treatment) and 11(2) (Right to Privacy) of the Convention, in relation to Articles 21 (Right to Property) and 1(1) (Obligation to Respect Rights) thereof; (e) The seven hundred and two (702) persons displaced from El Aro and La Granja, who are indicated in Appendix IV of this judgment, as victims of the violation of Articles 5 (Right to Humane Treatment) and 22 (Freedom of Movement and Residence) of the Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) (Obligation to Respect Rights) thereof, and in relation to Article 19 of this instrument in the case of the children; and (f) The twenty-seven (27) persons displaced whose homes were destroyed in El Aro, who are indicated in Appendix III of this judgment, as victims of the violation of Article 5 (Right to Humane Treatment) of the Convention, in relation to Article 11(2) (Right to Privacy), 21 (Right to Property), 22 (Freedom of Movement and Residence) and 1(1) (Obligation to Respect Rights) thereof. 362. The compensation determined by the Court shall be delivered to each beneficiary as a victim of the violations indicated in paragraphs 138, 168, 200, 235, 248, 279 and 344 of this judgment. 363. In the case of the victims or their next of kin, who are beneficiaries of the compensation established in this judgment and who are deceased or die before the respective compensation is delivered to them or who are subsequently identified, the criteria for the distribution of the compensation indicated in paragraph 362 apply. * * * 364. Before continuing on to the sections on reparations for pecuniary and nonpecuniary damage, the Court observes that some of the victims have obtained compensation through the mechanisms available in the domestic sphere (supra para. 125(101)). Bearing this in mind, the said amounts may be deducted by the State when paying these people the pecuniary reparations established in this judgment. 365. In this regard, the Court observes that it is possible that, in some cases, the amounts established in the domestic sphere may be substantially more than those established by the Court for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage. One of the principal purposes of the Colombian administrative jurisdiction, through the action for direct reparation, is precisely to grant the corresponding pecuniary reparation when damage has been caused by an illegal act of a public official. In contrast, this Court seeks, above all, to determine whether, in the cases filed before it, the State is