92. In response to this request, the Director of the Municipal Cemetery reported that, on September 27, 1976, a coffin identified as “no name” bearing a person about 30 years of age who had died the preceding day was buried in Section 14. He pointed out that said “no name” was the only person deceased for that day. He indicated that, on January 30, 1984, on the basis of a court order, it was forbidden to disinter the “no names” since 1973 “[b]ut after various disinterments on June 19, 1986, Judge Carlos Alberto Currais released the graves, authorizing their transfer to the General Ossuary” because of which “in Section 14 there are currently no “no names” currently buried there.” He reported, in addition, that, on the basis of an order of May 2001 from the Federal Court of Appeals in Criminal and Correctional Matters of the Federal Capital instructing that there be no disinterment of any “no names,” Argentina’s Forensic Anthropology Team conducted various disinterments.89 According to file No. 2.810 of the Ledger of “Corpse files,” the cause of death was “shot by military authorities.”90 The death certificate also establishes that “no name died of a traumatic cardiac arrest. Acute hemorrhaging. Gunshot wounds.”91 93. On November 19, 2012, Anatole Larrabeiti Yáñez, in the framework of Case No. 2637/04, submitted a request for him to be presented as a complainant. In this brief, he indicated, regarding his transfer and that of his sister to “Orletti,” that, although “it does not strictly constitute the target of the charges brought against those prosecuted,” the “narrative of said incidents is also useful to secure a complete overview of the totality of the outcomes of the operation.” He also pointed out that, although the participation and criminal liability of Nerone and Gutiérrez have been confirmed in the prosecution documents, they are not the only ones responsible or the highest-ranking ones either. 92 Afterwards, around the end of 2012, Anatole Larrabeiti submitted a petition for the case to be brought to trial. He also requested “continuing with the investigation in [the] cemetery because there does not seem to be any doubt that this is where the remains of Mario Roger Julien can be found,” on the basis of what is indicated in the cemetery’s response according to which there was a 1986 court order authorizing the transfer of “no names” since 1973 to the General Ossuary. Furthermore, he requested securing certified photocopies of the relevant parts of the case in order to investigate: “the crimes of which [he]and his sister were the victims,” “crimes against property of which the Julien-Grisonas family was a victim,” “the fate of Victoria Grisonas,” and “to individually identify the other troops who participated in the operation of September 26, 1976.”93 94. On September 11, 2017, Federal Criminal Oral Court No. 1, in the framework of this case known as “Orletti III,”94 convicted Rolando Nerone and Oscar Gutiérrez as co-perpetrators criminally responsible for the crime of unlawful deprivation of liberty committed by a civil servant, with abuse of their powers and without the formalities required by law, aggravated by violence or threats, to the detriment of Victoria Grisonas, and sentenced them to six years of prison.95 The court confirmed that both former police officers spearheaded the illegal operation carried out on September 26, 1976. It also established that data from civil lawsuit No. 14.846/96 filed by the Larrabeiti Yáñez siblings “shed light on the circumstances of the time, mode, and place that the operation being examined took place.” Although the court was able to prove that Mario Julien was killed in the framework of this operation, it acquitted both former police officers for the crime of felony murder with malice aforethought to his detriment, because there was no “evidence in the documents to substantiate Annex XX. Response from the Director of the General San Martín Municipal Cemetery, Province of Buenos Aires, June 29, 2012 to the request for information from Justice Daniel Eduardo Rafecas. Annex 5 to the brief from the petitioner, November 12, 2012. 90 Annex XX. Ledge “Corpse File,” File No. 2.810, p. 82. Annex 1 to the brief from the petitioner, November 12, 2012. 91 Annex XX. Death certificate of “no name” (NN). Certificate No. 1169. Annex 3 to the brief from the petitioner, November 12, 2012. 92 Annex XX. Brief from Anatole Alejandro Larrabeiti Yáñez requesting that he be registered as complainant in Case No. 2.637/04. No date, p. 4. Annex to the brief from the petitioner, November 21, 2012. 93 Annex XX. Brief from Anatole Alejandro Larrabeiti Yáñez requesting that Case No. 2.637/04 be taken to trial. No date, pp. 12, 16, and 17. Annex to the brief from the petitioner, December 12, 2012. 94 Case No. 2637/04 was consolidated with the following cases for the purpose of joining the cases: No. 2.261 identified as “Ferrer, José Néstor; Nerone, Rolando Oscar; and Gutiérrez, Oscar Roberto on the unlawful and aggravated deprivation of liberty involving violence or threats and felony murder with malice aforethought” and No. 2.390 identified as “Enciso, César Alejandro on the unlawful and aggravated deprivation of liberty involving violence or threats.” Judicial Branch of the Nation. Judgment of the Federal Criminal Cassation Appeal Court, Chamber IV, February 27, 2019, p. 4. Available at: https://www.cij.gov.ar/nota-33494-Anulan-absoluciones-en-una-causa-por-delitos-delesa-humanidad.html 95 Judicial Branch of the Nation. Judgment of the Federal Criminal Cassation Appeal Court, Chamber IV, February 27, 2019, p. 4. Available at: https://www.cij.gov.ar/nota-33494-Anulan-absoluciones-en-una-causa-por-delitos-de-lesa-humanidad.html 89