Inter-American Court of Human Rights Case of Acevedo-Jaramillo et al. v. Peru Judgment of November 24, 2006 (Interpretation of the Judgment of Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs) In the case of Acevedo-Jaramillo et al. v. Peru, The Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter, “the Court”, or “the InterAmerican Court” or "the Tribunal"), composed of the following judges **: Sergio García-Ramírez, President; Alirio Abreu-Burelli, Vice-President; Antônio A. Cançado-Trindade, Judge; Cecilia Medina-Quiroga, Judge; Manuel E. Ventura-Robles, Judge; and Javier de Belaunde-López de Romaña, Judge ad hoc; also present, Pablo Saavedra-Alessandri, Secretary, and Emilia Segares-Rodríguez, Deputy Secretary; pursuant to Article 67 of the American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” or “the American Convention”) and Article 59 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court (hereinafter “the Rules of Procedure”), delivers the following judgment on the requests for interpretation of the Judgment of Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs issued by the Court on February 7, 2006 in the case of Acevedo-Jaramillo, et al. (hereinafter “the Judgment of the Court”) filed on May 29 and 30, 2006 by Saavedra-Rivera, Héctor Paredes-Márquez, Pablo Gonza Tito and Marcelino Isidro Huere, who are the victims' representatives other than the common intervener for the representatives. ** Judge Diego García-Sayán, a Peruvian national, was not part of the Court in this case because at the time he was sworn in, the State of Peru had already appointed a judge ad hoc pursuant to the provisions of Article 10 of the Statute of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Furthermore, Judge Oliver Jackman did not participate in the deliberations and signing of the instant Judgment because, as he informed, due to reasons beyond his control, he would be unable to attend the 73 rd Regular Session of the Court.