2 4. The communications filed by the representatives of the beneficiaries who are members of the Gómez-Paquiyauri family on September 3 and October 29, 2007, and January 25 and April 9, 2008, whereby the representatives submitted their comments on the State’s reports (supra Having Seen clause No. 3). 5. The communications filed by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Commission” or “the Commission”) on November 21, 2007 and April 16, 2008, whereby the Commission submitted its comments on the State’s reports (supra Having Seen clause No. 3) and on the comments of the representatives of the Gómez-Paquiyauri family (supra Having Seen clause No. 4). 6. The note of the Secretariat of the Court (hereinafter “the Secretariat”) of October 30, 2007, whereby, following the President’s instructions, the State, the Inter-American Commission and the representatives of the beneficiaries were required to submit their comments by November 12, 2007 regarding the existence and continuation of the situation of extreme gravity and urgency and potential risk of irreparable damage that would warrant maintaining these provisional measures in force. 7. The communication submitted by the State on February 29, 2008, whereby it stated that Peru had no intention to “add to the pain suffered” by the Gómez-Paquiyauri family and that protection of Vásquez-Chumo and the members of his family should continue until final judgment is rendered against César Augusto Santoyo-Castro, who was a co-accused with Vásquez-Chumo in the criminal case concerning the death of the Gómez-Paquiyauri brothers. 8. The communication submitted on November 12, 2007 by the representatives of the beneficiaries who are members of the Gómez-Paquiyauri family, requesting that the provisional measures ordered in favor of the family be maintained for at least six months from the date of said communication. The representatives considered that at the time there was a “tense atmosphere” in Peru in relation to the Judgment rendered by this Court in the Case of the Miguel Castro-Castro Prison, and that given that there is a connection between the case and some members of the Gómez-Paquiyauri family, it would be convenient to maintain the measures ordered in their favor to avoid “giving the wrong impression that they have lost the protection afforded by the Inter-American Court.” 9. The communication submitted by the Inter-American Commission on January 31, 2008, in which the Commission stated that the request made by the representatives of the Gómez-Paquiyauri family was “reasonable in light of the circumstances of the case”. 10. The notes of the Secretariat of January 18, February 4, and April 10, 2008, whereby the parties where informed that the time limit for Jacinta Peralta-Allccarima and Elizabeth Teresa Segura Marquina to submit their comments concerning the existence and continuance of the situation of extreme gravity and urgency and potential risk of irreparable damage that would warrant maintaining the provisional measures ordered by the Court in favor of Jacinta Peralta-Allccarima and Nora Emely Gómez-Peralta, as well as of Ángel del Rosario Vásquez-Chumo and the members of his family had expired on November 12, 2007 (supra Having Seen clause No. 6) and that no comments had been received by the Secretariat. Therefore, following the instructions of the President of the Court, Jacinta Peralta Allccarima y Elizabeth Teresa Segura Marquina were requested to comply with such request without delay. At the time of issuance of this Order, the required information has not been received.