83 instant case, especially into the allegations of torture against Messrs. Cabrera and Montiel, in order to determine the corresponding criminal responsibilities and, if it were the case, effectively apply the punishments and consequences established by law. This obligation shall be complied with within a reasonable period of time, following the criteria established regarding investigations in this type of cases,324 which includes due diligence in the investigation into the different hypotheses of the reasons that would have given rise to the attacks to humane treatment against Messrs. Cabrera and Montiel. In this respect, the Court observes that the Istanbul Protocol has been adopted in the domestic legislation (supra para. 119) and it is important that those standards are used in order to strengthen the due diligence, suitability and effectiveness of the respective investigation. Likewise, should the procedural and investigative irregularities related to the facts are proven while under investigation, it will be appropriate to adopt the pertinent disciplinary, administrative or criminal actions. C. Measures of satisfaction, rehabilitation and guarantees of nonrepetition C.1 Measures of satisfaction i) Publication of the Judgment 216. The Commission requested the Court to order the State to publish this Judgment in a communication media with national circulation. The representatives indicated that such publication must be done “both in the Official Gazette of the Federation as well as in two newspapers with the largest circulation in the country chosen in common agreement with the victims.” Likewise, the representatives requested that excerpts of the Judgment should be published in the “Official Gazette of the [s]tate of Guerrero and in the dissemination media of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, the Judiciary of the Federation, the Public Federal Defense Office, the Secretariat for National Defense (SEDENA) and the Secretariat for the Environment and Natural Resources (SEMARNAT).” On the other hand, “[i]n view of the fact that the radio is more used in the state of Guerrero, the publication of the Judgment should also me made [using] such media,” particularly to “cover the municipalities of Petatlán and Coyuca de Catalán.” 217. As the Tribunal has ordered in other cases,325 the Court deems appropriate to order the State, as a measure of satisfaction, to publish this Judgment, once, in the Official Gazette of the Federation and in the Semanario Judicial de la Federación [Judiciary Weekly Magazine] and its Gazette, with the corresponding headings and subheadings, but without the footnotes, as well as the operative paragraphs. Likewise, the State must: i) publish the official summary of the Judgment issued by the Court in a newspaper with wide national circulation and in a newspaper of a large circulation in the state of Guerrero; ii) fully publish this Judgment326 in the official web site of the Federal State and of the state of Guerrero, taking into account the characteristics of the publication ordered, which 324 Cf. Case of Radilla Pacheco v. Mexico, supra note 302, para. 331; Case of Fernandez Ortega et al v. Mexico, supra note 39, para. 228; and Case of Rosendo Cantú et al v. Mexico, supra note 30, para. 211. 325 Cf. Case of Barrios Altos v. Perú. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 30, 2001. Series C N° 87, Operative Paragraph 5.d); Case of Rosendo Cantu et al v. Mexico, supra note 30, para. 229; and Case of Ibsen Cárdenas and Ibsen Peña, supra note 30, para. 244. 326 Cf. Case of the Serrano Cruz Sisters v. El Salvador. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of March 1, 2005. Series C No. 120, para. 195; Case of Rosendo Cantú et al v. Mexico, supra note 30, para. 229; and Case of Ibsen Cárdenas and Ibsen Peña v. Bolivia, supra note 30, para. 244.