12 25. The Court admitted the affidavits rendered by the following witnesses and expert witnesses: 1) Teodoro Cabrera García, alleged victim, a witness proposed by the representatives, who deposed on the following aspects: i) “the organizational process of the Organización de Campesinos Ecologistas de la Sierra de Petatlán y Coyuca de Catalán (OCESP) (Organization of Ecologist Peasants of Sierra de Petatlán and Coyuca de Catalán), and his participation in such organization;” ii) the facts of the alleged violations committed, “as well as the [alleged] persistent affectations to his physical and psychological health,” iii) “the [alleged] affectations to his family members resulting from the reported violations,” and iv) “the measures that the State should adopt to repair the damages caused;” 2) Miguel Olivar López, Mr. Cabrera García’s stepson, a witness proposed by the representatives, who deposed on the following aspects: i) the alleged affectations of the Cabrera López family resulting from “the [alleged] unlawful and arbitrary detention, torture, imprisonment, criminal proceedings and lack of justice in his father’s case;” ii) how “the [alleged] violations of the reported human rights had an impact on his family’s capacity to earn a living by tilling the soil of an old community plot,” iii) the alleged affectations to the health and well-being of his family members; iv) “the [alleged] impossibility to return to his community;” v) “the [alleged] persistent affectation [to his] family, due to both the [alleged] lack of recognition of his father’s innocence and the [alleged] ineffective investigation into the acts of torture and other abuse against him;” vi) “the present situation of Teodoro Cabrera and his family,” and vii) “the measures that the State should adopt to repair the damages caused;” 3) Ubalda Cortés Salgado, wife of Rodolfo Montiel Flores, a witness proposed by the representatives, who deposed on the following aspects: i) “the organizational process of OCEPS[,] as well as the work and struggle to defend the forests, particularly the work by Messrs. [Cabrera García and Montiel Flores];” ii) “the circumstances of the [alleged] unlawful and arbitrary detention of [the alleged victims] and indicated the affectation to her husband’s health due to the [alleged facts that occurred];” iii) “the affectation to her own well-being and the well-being of the members of her family due to the [alleged] violations, and iv) “the necessary and adequate reparation measures in this case;” 4) Mario Ernesto Patrón Sánchez, counsel for the alleged victims in the domestic proceedings, a witness proposed by the representatives, who deposed on the following aspects: i) the alleged errors and irregularities of the domestic criminal proceeding conducted against Messrs. Cabrera García and Montiel Flores, who he represented as their lawyer and human rights advocate; ii) how the local judicial instances allegedly hindered the presentation or consideration of the evidence of the alleged torture suffered by the two alleged victims; iii) the alleged juridical and practical impediments faced during the exercise of their defense, and iv) “the [alleged] fabrication of evidence which he verified in the domestic criminal proceedings at local, federal and military levels;” 5) Celsa Valdovinos Ríos, a defender of Petatlán forests and awardee of the “Chico Mendes” environmental prize for her work in favor of the environment in the Guerrero state, a witness proposed by the representatives, who deposed on the following aspects: i) “the context of environmental devastation of the forests in the region;” ii) “the foundation process of OCESP, making reference to the [alleged] harassment and attacks against environmental defenders;” iii) the activities of OCESP,