a. FIRST.- Within a period of one month, the [State should articulate] a proposal for a campaign of dissemination and recognition of the work performed by human rights defenders in the context of a democratic state, [to be assessed by the parties]. b. SECOND.- Within eight days, the [State] [should submit], for assessment by the beneficiary, a technical report produced by experts on the installation [of] security infrastructure and technical measures at the Women’s Human Rights Center and the place of residence of the beneficiary, to establish a timeline for its subsequent installation. c. THIRD.- [The State should conduct] a review of the code blue system (emergency buttons) located at the Women’s Human Rights Center and at the intersection of La Junta and Juarez avenues and of the public security camera located at the intersection of Juarez and Pacheco avenues, as well as the street lighting in the surrounding area of the Center, in order to permanently ensure their proper functioning. d. FOURTH.- [The State], as a measure to ensure the immediate communication of the beneficiary, [would] manage the delivery of two sets of radio communication systems, as well as the installation of a panic button on the mobile equipment designated for this purpose. e. FIFTH.- [The State should provide the beneficiary] escort services by accredited police forces […] when traveling to various areas of Chihuahua […]. f. SIXTH.- [The State appointed] Attorney Jaime Tonathiu Cano, Secretariat of Public Security to the Attorney General, as a high-level official, with the capacity to make decisions and react immediately, to serve as a 24-hour contact in case of an emergency. g. SEVENTH.- [The State undertook to implement] daily police patrols in the CEDEHM, in conjunction with logs or register forms […] to be signed off by the staff of the Center, in order to ensure [compliance]. h. EIGHTH.- In order to identify the beneficiaries of the provisional measures, the [State] [would] forward the appropriate official letters to the authorities involved. i. NINTH.- With respect to the events that occurred on April 4, [2013] (infra paragraph 11) on the premises of the CEDEHM, [the State, through a specialized unit, would perform the investigations] in order to reinforce the exhaustion of the lines of investigation with the most certainty, as well as of the various [investigation] [f]iles where the beneficiary and members of the CEDEHM appear as victims. […] 10. In this regard, the State detailed several of the actions taken with respect to each of the items discussed at the work meeting, indicating, respectively, that: a. it created the Department of Public Policy on Human Rights, whose main purpose is the promotion of cross-cultural respect for human rights at the various levels of government as well as the establishment of the “Protection Mechanism for Human Rights Defenders and Journalists,” recognized by law since June 25, 2012; b. it annexed the specialized technical report on the security of the place of residence of the beneficiary and the CEDEHM. Furthermore, through correspondence dated August 23, 2013, it reported that “specialized security personnel were in the 3