2 3. It would] maintain open the monitoring procedure until the obligations pending compliance in the instant case are complied with, in accordance with considering paragraphs 16, 17, 26, 31, and 24, namely: a) To broadcast the judgment by radio and television (tenth operative paragraph of the judgment); b) To take forthwith all the legislative, administrative or other measures necessary to eliminate ex officio the criminal record of those persons who are acquitted or whose cases are dismissed (twelfth operative paragraph of the judgment); c) To submit to an arbitration procedure to establish the amounts corresponding to pecuniary damage for Mr. Chaparro (thirteenth operative paragraph of the judgment), and d) To pay Mr. Chaparro the bank interest on arrears in Ecuador indicated in paragraph 245 of the judgment (fourteenth operative paragraph of the judgment). 3. The communication of May 27, 2010, and its attachments, with which Mr. Chaparro forwarded, inter alia, documents relating to the friendly settlement signed with the Republic of Ecuador (hereinafter “Ecuador” or “the State”). 4. The note of the Secretariat of the Court (hereinafter “the Secretariat”) of June 4, 2010, requesting the State to present any observations it deemed pertinent on the information sent by Mr. Chaparro regarding the thirteenth operative paragraph of the judgment. 5. The communication of June 11, 2010, and its attachments, in which the State advised that it had appointed Cesar Molina as one of the arbitrators to constitute the court of arbitration that would establish the amounts corresponding to the pecuniary damage caused to Mr. Chaparro Álvarez. 6. The note of the Secretariat of June 17, 2010, in which, on the instructions of the President of the Court, it asked Mr. Chaparro’s representatives (hereinafter “the representatives”) to appoint an arbitrator to the court of arbitration. 7. The brief of June 18, 2010 and its attachments, in which the representatives appointed Ricardo Vaca Andrade as an arbitrator to establish the amounts corresponding to the pecuniary damage caused to Mr. Chaparro Álvarez, and advised that they had asked for a meeting with the State to determine the third arbitrator whose appointment was pending. 8. The note of the Secretariat of June 21, 2010, in which, on the instruction of the President, it asked the State to respond to the representatives’ proposal to hold a meeting to appoint, by mutual agreement, the third arbitrator required to constitute the court of arbitration. 9. The communication of August 19, 2010, and its attachments, in which the State forwarded a report on compliance with the judgment. 10. The briefs of September 7 and 29, 2010, and their corresponding attachments, in which Mr. Chaparro forwarded, inter alia, information on the appointment of arbitrators for the arbitration procedure established in the judgment, and submitted his observations on the report presented by the State. 11. The communication of September 29, 2010, and its attachments, in which the State sent information on the appointment of arbitrators for the said arbitration procedure and proposed Alicia Arias and Carlos Andreta as candidates for Ecuador.