effectively guaranteed the possibility of contesting the constitutionality of the legal regulation of the right to be elected, in the terms of paragraphs 227 to 231 of the Judgment […]. 6. The briefs of September 7, 2009, March 1 and July 13, 2010, and August 29, 2011, in which the State reported on the measures adopted in relation to the aspect pending compliance. 7. The briefs of October 8, 2009, March 17 and August 10, 2010, and September 15 and November 14, 2011, and their respective annexes, in which the representatives presented their observations on the reports of the State. 8. The briefs of November 30, 2009, May 7 and September 1, 2010, and October 5, 2011, and their respective annexes, in which the Commission forwarded its observations on the reports of the State and on the information presented by the representatives. 9. The Order of the President of the Court of January 18, 2012, in which he decided to convene the parties and the Commission to a private hearing in the context of monitoring compliance with of the Judgment. 10. The arguments of the parties and of the Commission during the private hearing on compliance with the pending aspect of the Judgment held on February 20, 2012, at the seat of the Court. 1 11. The briefs of April 2 and September 12, 2012 and of February 18, 2013, and the annexes to the latter, in which the State reported on the measures adopted in relation to the aspect pending compliance. 12. The briefs of February 14, March 30, September 6 and November 13, 2012, and January 15, June 5 and 14, 2013, and their respective annexes, in which the representatives presented their observations on the reports of the State, together with additional information on an application for amparo filed by Mr. Castañeda Gutman on January 9, 2012, in relation to this case. 13. The briefs of April 5, 2012, and January 29 and May 20, 2013, in which the InterAmerican Commission forwarded is observations on the reports of the State and on the information presented by the representatives. CONSIDERING THAT: 1 There appeared at this hearing: for the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights: Karla Quintana Osuna, adviser; for the representatives of the victim Jorge Castañeda Gutman: Gonzalo Aguilar Zinser, Fabián Aguinaco Bravo, Santiago Corcuera Cabezut, Pedro Saez Pueyo and Manuel Rodríguez Woog, and for the State: Joel Hernández García, Permanent Representative of Mexico to the OAS; Alejandro Alday González, Deputy Director General of Cases, Democracy and Human Rights of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Juan José Cespedes Hernández, Deputy Director General of the Legal Advisory Services of the Federal Executive; José Luis Ceballos Daza, Judicial Clerk attached to the rapporteurship of Justice Constancio Carrasco Daza of the Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judiciary; Sergio Arturo Guerrero Olvera, Coordinator of Jurisprudence, Monitoring and Consultation of the Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judiciary; María Eugenia Tapia Benavides, Chargée d’affaires, a.i., Embassy of Mexico in Costa Rica; Rafael Barceló Durazo, Head of Political Affairs and Human Rights, Embassy of Mexico in Costa Rica; Rafael Elizondo Gasperín, Assistance Secretary General of Settlements of the Superior Chamber of the Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judiciary, and Citlalli Jesica Villanueva Amador, Adviser to the Sub-secretariat of Legal Affairs of the Ministry of the Interior. 2