2 4. To repeat that the Tribunal will keep the proceedings for monitoring compliance with the Judgment open with the sole purpose of receiving: (a) the receipts of payment to the victims or successors who signed the agreements, and (b) the receipts of the bank deposits to those persons who did not sign the agreements or who withdrew their consent after signing them. 5. To require the State of Panama to submit to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, no later than October 30, 2009, a report stating the measures adopted pursuant to this Order and the documents of the payments and bank deposits made as the second annual disbursement, and the receipts of bank deposits for the first annual disbursement which are pending submission, and the remaining information stated in […] Order. […] 3. The communications of November 5 and December 16, 2009, by which the Secretariat of the Inter-American Court (hereinafter, the “Secretariat”), following the instructions of the then President of the Court, requested the Republic of Panama (hereinafter, the “State” or “Panama”) to immediately submit the report regarding the compliance with the Judgment. 4. The brief of January 5, 2010, and the annexes thereto, by which the State forwarded the report and furnished “copies of the settlements under Law 25, corresponding to the Ministry of Education, Cemento Bayano, IDAAN, INRENARE, Port Authorities and Ministry of Public Works”. 5. The communications of January 26, 2010, by which the Secretariat, following the instructions of the President of the Tribunal (hereinafter, the “President”), requested the State to forward, no later than February 3, 2010, copy of the checks issued in favor of nine victims or their successors corresponding to the second payment; copy of the agreements signed by six victims or their successors and the copy of the guarantee certificates in favor of one victim corresponding to the two payments made. 6. The brief of February 8, 2010, by which Panama furnished the copies of the agreements signed and the checks issued in favor of the victims, which delivery was pending. 7. The briefs of February 3, 13, and 23, 2010, among other briefs submitted, by which the Organización de Trabajadores Víctimas de la Ley 25 de 1990 de la República de Panamá (Organization of Workers Victims of Law No. 25 of 1990 of the Republic of Panama, hereinafter, “the Organización de Trabajadores Víctimas de la Ley 25”), referred to the compliance with the Judgment and requested the Tribunal a copy of several documents. 8. The communications of February 12 and March 5, 2010, by which the Secretariat indicated to the Organización de Trabajadores Victimas that the required information had already been delivered and that any observation as to the compliance with the Judgment could be submitted together with the observations to the state report. 9. The briefs of March 9 and 11, 2010, by which the Organización de Trabajadores Víctimas referred to the compliance with the Judgment. 10. The brief of March 10, 2010, and the annexes thereto, by which the Center for Justice and International Law (hereinafter, “CEJIL”) forwarded its observations to the state report.