283. This Court has confirmed the harm caused to Sebastián Furlan by the delay in the proceedings that prevented him from obtaining access to medical and psychological treatment that could have had a positive impact on his life (supra paras. 197 to 203), as demonstrated by the expert medical opinions presented during the proceedings (supra paras. 197 to 203). The effects on Sebastián Furlan’s household have also been demonstrated (supra paras. 252 to 265) and are supported by the socio-economic studies and the relevant expert opinions submitted in this case (supra paras. 252 to 265). In this regard, the Court stresses that the expert opinion provided in the instant case emphasizes that highlights in such cases, rehabilitation must be provided in an early and timely manner to achieve ideal results443, that it must be continuous and must go beyond the initial stage of greater complexity. Rehabilitation must take into account the type of disability that the person has and be coordinated by a multidisciplinary team that addresses all the aspects of a person as whole.444 284. Consequently, the Court finds, as it has in other cases 445 that it is appropriate to order a measure of reparation that provides adequate treatment for the psychological and physical problems suffered by the victims as a result of the violations declared in this judgment. Therefore, the Court considers it necessary to order the State to provide, free of charge and immediately, through its specialized health care services, adequate and effective medical, psychological and psychiatric treatment to the victims, with their prior informed consent, including the provision of any medicines they may eventually require, also free of charge, taking into consideration the health problems of each one. Furthermore, the respective treatments must be provided, to the extent possible, at the facilities nearest to their places of residence and for as long as necessary. 446 In addition, when providing the psychological or psychiatric treatment, the specific circumstances and needs of each victim must be considered, so that they are provided with family and individual treatments, as agreed with each one, following an individual assessment. 447 The victims who require this measure of reparation, or their legal representatives, have six months as of notification of this Judgment to advise the State of their intention to receive medical, psychological or psychiatric treatment.448 B.1.2) Rehabilitation in relation to the life project 285. Regarding the presumed “damage to personal relationships” alleged by the representatives in the case of Sebastián Furlan, the Court, taking into account the reasoning conducive to the child’s achieving the fullest possible social integration and individual development, including his or her cultural and spiritual development.” 443 In this regard, the expert witness Estela Rodríguez stated that: “[the] sooner the rehabilitation is started, the better the results will be because it prevents the brain from perpetuating the malfunction (it always does) during the recovery process.” Affidavit rendered by medical expert Estela del Carmen Rodríguez of February 10, 2012 (Merits file, volume II, page 753). 444 Cf. Statement by expert witness Laura Beatriz Subies at the public hearing in this case. 445 Cf. Case of Cantoral Benavides v. Peru. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of December 3, 2001. Series C No. 88. para. 57, and Case of González Medina v. Dominican Republic, para. 293. 446 Cf. Case of the Dos Erres Massacre v. Guatemala. Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 24, 2009. Series C No. 211. para. 270, and Case of González Medina v. Dominican Republic, para. 293. 447 Cf. Case of the 19 Tradesmen v. Colombia. Preliminary Objection. Judgment of June 12, 2002. Series C No. 93, para. 278, and Case of González Medina v. Dominican Republic, para. 293. 448 Cf. Case of Fernández Ortega et al. v. Mexico, para. 252, and Case of González Medina v. Dominican Republic, para.293. 89