c) On October 24 and November 29, 2005, July 11, March 22, August 7, November 2 and December 18, 2006, and March 7, 2007, the investigators of the Criminal Investigation Department of the Public Prosecution Service prepared their respective investigation reports, which were sent to the assistant prosecutor, 74 and d) On May 9 and June 23, 2006, August 4 and 22 and September 22, 2011, and January 9 and 19, February 6 and March 12, 2012, the investigators of the PNC Special Criminal Investigation Division drew up investigation reports, which they forwarded to the assistant prosecutor.75 65. Procedures conducted based on the evidence collected on the corpse of Claudina Velásquez. On August 13, 2005, an order was issued to perform laboratory tests for blood alcohol level and prohibited drugs, and on rectal and vaginal swabs, and fingernail scrapings. In response, it is recorded that the forensic physician who performed the autopsy took blood, urine and liver samples, together with samples from her nails, and rectal and vaginal swabs.76 The tests described below were performed on these samples. 66. On September 16, 2005, an expert report was issued on the alcohol and drug tests based on the blood, liver and urine samples, which found an alcohol level of 1,4g/L in the blood and 2,4 g/L in the urine, with no trace of drugs. 77 In addition, on November 18, 2011, and at the request of the assistant prosecutor, the Guatemalan National Institute of Forensic Science (hereinafter “INACIF”) issued a report in which it provided a standard table of levels of alcohol according to which Claudina Velásquez was slightly inebriated (agitated).78 67. On September 26, 2005, the Criminal Investigation Department of the Public Prosecution Service issued a report which identified the presence of semen in the vagina, but not in the rectal cavity.79 On January 24 and June 12, 2006, March 5, 2008, and July 28 and September 14, 2009, the Forensic Medicine Department of the Universidad de Granada, Spain, received blood samples from eight individuals linked to the investigation from the Guatemalan Public Prosecution Service in order to compare their genetic profiles to the genetic profile of the semen found on the vaginal swab taken from Claudina Velásquez. As a result, on February 3 and June 26, 2006, March 28, 2008, and October 5 and 23, 2009, that laboratory determined that a genetic profile compatible with a man was evident on the vaginal swabs, but that it did not coincide with the genetic profile of any of the suspects. 80 Finally, on June 6, 2012, the assistant prosecutor asked the INACIF to compare the result of the genetic profile of one more person 5318 to 5322, 5339, 5340 to 5342, 5348 to 5377, 5465 to 5469, 5673 to 5676, 5685 to 5686, 5695, 6152, 6153, 6165 to 6166, 6204 to 6211 and 6274 to 6283). 74 Cf. Reports of the investigator of the Criminal Investigations Department of the Public Prosecution Service of 2005, 2006 and 2007 (evidence file, folios 3002 to 3013, 3052 to 3055, 4760 to 4766, 4767 to 4778, 4688 to 4712, 4781 to 4784, 4805 to 4810, 4825 to 4827 and 4828 to 4831). 75 Cf. Report of the investigators of the Criminal Investigation Division of the PNC of 2006, 2011 and 2012 (evidence file, folios 4996 to 4997, 4998 to 5003, 5305 to 5307, 5334 to 5336, 5457 to 5670, 5679 to 5682, 5696 to 5697 and 5754 to 5756). 76 Cf. Form on the Removal and Transfer of Corpses of August 13, 2005, Public Prosecution Service (evidence file, folio 27), and Letter of the forensic physician of the Public Prosecution Service of August 30, 2005 (evidence file, folio 35). 77 Cf. Expert report TOXI-05-2620 of September 16, 2005 (evidence file, folios 93 and 94), and Request for an expert opinion of August 26, 2005 (evidence file, folio 4182). 78 Report TOXI-11-11371 INACIF-11-30730 of the National Institute of Forensic Science of November 18, 2011 (evidence file, folios 4172 and 5648 to 5649). 79 Cf. Report BIOL-05-1455 of the Criminal Investigations Department of September 29, 2005 (evidence file, folio 90). 80 Cf. Criminalistic report GU-C03/06 of February 3, 2006 (evidence file, folios 4678 to 4680); Criminalistic report GU-C12/06 of June 26, 2006 (evidence file, folios 4791 to 4793); Criminalistic report GU-C07/08 of March 28, 2008 (evidence file, folios 4871 to 4873); Criminalistic report GU-C72/09 of October 23, 2009 (evidence file, folios 4900 to 4902); Criminalistic report GU-C61/09 of October 5, 2009 (evidence file, folios 4904 to 4906), and Prosecutor’s Report of March 12, 2012 (evidence file, folio 5865). 24