2 c) “assume the payment of the fees and expenses of all experts and attorneys engaged by the State and the Province of Santiago del Estero, under the conditions set forth in the previous point” (operative paragraph three of the Judgment of November 28, 2002), and d) “lift the attachments, general property encumbrances and other measures ordered against the assets and commercial activities of Mr. José María Cantos to guarantee payment of the court filing fee and the regulated professional fees” (operative paragraph four of the Judgment of November 28, 2002). AND DECIDE[D]: 1. [t]o call upon the State to adopt all measures necessary to promptly and effectively comply with the operative paragraphs pending compliance that were ordered by the Court in the Judgment on merits, reparations and costs of November 28, 2002, pursuant to article 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights[, and] 2. [t]o request that the State submit a report specifying all measures adopted to comply with the reparations ordered by this Court that are still pending compliance, in conformity with Considering clause ten and the declaratory paragraph of this Order, no later than September 28, 2007. […] 4. The briefs of October 1, 2007, March 14, 2008, and February 2, 2009, whereby the Republic of Argentina (hereinafter “the State” or “Argentina”) reported on the status of compliance with the Judgment. 5. The briefs of February 4, 2008, April 16, 2008, March 17, 2009, and May 28, 2009, whereby the victim’s representative (hereinafter “the representative”) submitted her observations on the State’s reports on the status of compliance with the Judgment. 6. The briefs of November 15, 2007, May 21, 2008, March 26, 2009, whereby the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Commission” or “the Commission”) submitted its observations on the State’s reports on the status of compliance with the Judgment. 7. The communication of the Secretariat of February 6, 2009, whereby it requested that the representative submit complementary information on the current status of each of the reparations pending compliance. This requirement was reiterated on March 20 and May 20, 2009. Considering: 1. That it is an inherent power of the judicial functions of the Court to monitor compliance with its decisions. That Argentina has been a State Party to the American Convention on Human 2. Rights (hereinafter, the “Convention” or the “American Convention”) since September 5,