11 made in its last Order concerning this matter, and requires that the State and the representatives, in their next communications to the Court: (i) present detailed and complete information on the persistence of the situation of extreme gravity and urgency to the detriment of Mariela Duarte de Giraldo, Sara Giraldo and Natalia Giraldo that could cause irreparable damage to their rights, and (ii) refer expressly to the need to maintain these measures in favor of the said beneficiaries. B. Regarding the organization of an act to relaunch the Civic Human Rights Committee of Meta 30. Regarding the relaunching of the Civic Committee of Meta, in its report of June 1, 2010, the State advised that, on February 18, 2010, it had offered the beneficiary Islena Rey to organize the act on February 26 that year, but the said beneficiary had stated that “due to the short notice given, it would be better to postpone the act and agree on a new date.” Based on the foregoing, the State asked the beneficiaries to propose three possible dates, “specifying that they should be before July 31, 2010,” owing to the electoral process that would lead to a change of Government in August. Subsequently, with regard to the representatives‟ proposal, Colombia indicated that, “owing to the current political situation, it was not possible to make a commitment on the new Government‟s agenda on October 13.” The State emphasized that it understood the significance of organizing the act on that date, which was the anniversary of Mr. Giraldo Cardona‟s death, but that it was not possible to do so, “since the new Government was in the process of taking office.” However, it underscored that this “was not an obstacle to organizing the launch on another date,” and expressed “its willingness to reach an agreement with the beneficiaries” to that end. 31. For their part, in a communication of February 25, 2010, the representatives advised that, on June 4, 2010, they had proposed to the State that the act be carried out on October 13 that year, the date on which the fourteenth anniversary of the murder of Josué Giraldo Cardona was being commemorated, and had indicated “the conditions [they] consider[ed] necessary for the relaunch […] to comply with the objective of being a measure of protection for [the] members [of the Civic Committee] and of safeguard for their work.” Subsequently, in their observations of December 23, 2010, they indicated that it had been very difficult to set a date on which the people who would participate were available, so that they would forward some proposed dates opportunely. They said they hoped that the problems that had arisen would be overcome in 2011. 32. The Commission reiterated that the obligation to relaunch the Civic Committee of Meta “has been pending compliance for several years” and indicated that it hoped the respective obstacles could be overcome “with the guarantees of security required for its operation, as soon as possible.” 33. The Court takes note of the information provided regarding compliance with this measure and underlines the willingness expressed by the parties to reach agreement. However, given that several years have elapsed since its execution was requested, the Court urges the beneficiaries, their representatives, and the State to overcome the obstacles that have impeded the relaunching of the Civic Committee of Meta to date, so that they reach final agreement this year. The Court awaits information from the parties in this regard. C. Regarding the participation of the beneficiaries in the implementation of the measures