2 On the other hand, the Court held that the State had breached its obligations in respect to judicial guarantees, given that the proceedings had exceeded the time limit for reasonable settlement and, therefore, had no effect, indefinitely depriving the victim of her land, in addition to the payment for just compensation, making such expropriation an arbitrary one.6 9. However, I think that the budgetary capacity of the Municipality of Quito has not been duly considered within the factor of public interest, if there was an intention to properly assess the potential impact on the community's fiscal outlay required to make the payment for compensation awarded by the Court. An equity standard to consider the characteristics of the case would have required a special consideration of the public interest that would be potentially affected as a consequence of the payment of the Judgment on reparations ordered by the Court. Leonardo A. Franco Judge Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary 6 Case of Salvador Chiriboga V. Ecuador, suprano tae 1, para. 117.