52 188. The Prosecutorial Office that took cognizance of the investigation ruled that it lacked jurisdiction since the conduct investigated was not covered by any criminal statute, and concluded that the fact of Ms. Yarce leaving her home did not fit within the statutory definition of the crime of forced displacement.219 ii. Proceedings associated with the arbitrary arrest of Ms. Mosquera Londoño, Ms. Naranjo Jímenez and Ms. Yarce 189. Ms. Mosquera Londoño, Ms. Naranjo Jímenez and Ms. Yarce filed a complaint with the Office of the Prosecutor-Delegate for Human Rights asking that the civil servants responsible for their arrest be investigated and disciplined and that, if necessary, a criminal investigation be instituted.220 The Prosecutor’s Office learned of this complaint on July 21, 2003, which alleged the threats made against Ms. Yarce, Ms. Naranjo and Ms. Mosquera and the fact that they were arbitrarily arrested and held in custody from November 12 to 21, 2002.221 190. The Office of the Prosecutor-Delegate for Human Rights proceeded to conduct disciplinary inquiry No. 8-82157-2003222 and notified an Army Corporal Third Class based in Medellín that a preliminary investigation had been instituted against him.223 For jurisdictional reasons, the investigation was turned over to the Office of the Aburrá Valley (Antioquia) Provincial Prosecutor, where it is being conducted as case No. 136-5270-2004.224 A decision dated June 29, 2006 ordered that an investigation against the Corporal Third Class be instituted and various evidentiary measures taken.225 The case file contains several documents, such as the report documenting the fact that the three women were arrested and brought before the competent authority, an affidavit of good treatment, the report documenting the circumstances under which the women were apprehended, and the record of a special visit in connection with the criminal case against the three women taken into custody.226 Based on the evidence produced in the investigation, the Office of the Inspector General ordered it be archived on November 9, 2007.227 iii. Investigation into the murder of Ms. Yarce 191. Prosecutor 37 with Medellín’s Unidad 2ª de Vida [inquiries into cause of death] instituted an investigation into Ms. Yarce’s murder, which was transferred to the Office of Medellín’s Special Prosecutor for Human Rights, as case 2169.228 219 Note from the Colombian State DIDHD/GOI No. 77119/2954, November 15, 2012, p. 43. 220 Record No. 008-82861, joined with No. 008-082154, cited in the original petition in the matter of Socorro Mosquera Londoño and Mery Naranjo Jiménez – Comuna 13 – March 7, 2005, p. 7. 221 Colombian State’s note DH. GOI No. 12442-0552 of March 15, 2007, p. 9. 222 Colombian State’s note DDH. GOI No 31279/1533 of June 14, 2006, p. 8. 223 Colombian State’s note DH. GOI No. 12442-0552 of March 15, 2007, p. 9. 224 Colombian State’s note DDH. GOI No 31279/1533 of June 14, 2006, p. 8. 225 Colombian State’s note DDH. GOI No 31279/1533 of June 14, 2006, p. 8. 226 Colombian State’s note DH. GOI No. 12442-0552 of March 15, 2007, p. 9. 227 Note from the Colombian State DIDHD/GOI No. 77119/2954, November 15, 2012, p. 50. 228 Colombian State’s note DDH. GOI No 31279/1533 of June 14, 2006, p. 7.