3 a) organize a public act acknowledging its responsibility in relation to the […] case and offer a public apology to the victim’s next of kin (first operative paragraph, subparagraph b, of the Judgment of March 3, 2005); b) publish in the Official Gazette and in another national newspaper both the section entitled “Proven Facts” and the operative paragraphs of the Judgment (first operative paragraph, subparagraph c, of the Judgment of March 3, 2005); and c) pay the amounts established in paragraphs 92, 94, 95, 98, 99, 100, 101, 120, and 121 of the Judgment for non-pecuniary and pecuniary damage to Martha FloresGutiérrez, José Carlos Huilca-Flores, Indira Isabel Huilca-Flores, Flor de María HuilcaGutiérrez, Katiuska Tatiana Huilca-Gutiérrez, Pedro Humberto Huilca-Gutiérrez and Julio César Escobar-Flores (first operative paragraph, subparagraphs h, i and j, of the Judgment of March 3, 2005). 2. That it will keep open the proceeding for monitoring compliance with the aspects pending fulfillment, namely the obligations to: a) effectively investigate the facts of the […] case in order to identify, prosecute and punish the perpetrators and masterminds of the extrajudicial execution of Pedro Huilca-Tecse (first operative paragraph, subparagraph a, of the Judgment of March 3, 2005); b) establish a course or subject on human rights and labor law, called the “Cátedra Pedro Huilca” (first operative paragraph, subparagraph d, of the Judgment of March 3, 2005); c) recall and praise the work of Pedro Huilca-Tecse in favor of the trade union movement in Peru during the official celebrations of May 1 (Labor Day) (first operative paragraph, subparagraph e, of the Judgment of March 3, 2005); d) erect a bust in the memory of Pedro Huilca-Tecse (first operative paragraph, subparagraph f, of the Judgment of March 3, 2005); and e) provide psychological care and treatment to the next of kin of Pedro HuilcaTecse (first operative paragraph, subparagraph g, of the Judgment of March 3, 2005). AND DECIDE[D]: 1. To call upon the State to adopt such measures as may be necessary to promptly and effectively comply with the pending measures ordered by the Court in the Judgment on the merits, reparations and costs of March 3, 2005, pursuant to Article 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights. 2. To request that, by January 19, 2007, the State submit to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights a report specifying all such measures as may have been adopted to comply with the reparations ordered by this Court and which are still pending compliance, as established in Considering clause No. 11 and the second declarative paragraph of this Order. 3. To call upon the representatives of the victim’s next of kin and the InterAmerican Commission on Human Rights to submit their observations to the State’s report referred to in the preceding operative paragraph, within a period of four and six weeks, respectively, as from the date of receipt of the report. […] 3. The letters from the Secretary of the Court (hereinafter “the Secretary”) dated June 22, July 19, September 25, October 29, and November 16, 2007, through which, following the instructions of the President of the Court, it was requested that the State submit detailed information on the measures adopted toward complying with the operative paragraphs still pending compliance in the Judgment on the merits, reparations, and costs of this case (supra first Having Seen paragraph). The