31 their children, the Gómez Paquiyauri couple left their work activities for some time, the father for three weeks60 and the mother for a year.61 The older sister of the minors, Marcelina Haydeé Gómez Paquiyauri, who was nine months pregnant at the time of the facts, suffered a nervous ailment and lost her baby a few days later.62 In the days after the execution, Miguel Ángel was afraid to be alone at home and had problems sleeping. Also, when he completed secondary schooling he was unable to continue studying due to the financial difficulties faced by the family.63 Like her next of kin, Lucy Rosa Gómez Paquiyauri suffered physical health problems as a consequence of the facts. 67.y) On October 29, 1992 the sister of the alleged victims, Lucy Rosa Gómez Paquiyauri, who at the time was 16 years old, was detained, and set free four years later.64 67.z) Partial impunity in this case continues to cause suffering to the next of kin of Rafael Samuel and Emilio Moisés Gómez Paquiyauri.65 Regarding to representation of the next of kin before the inter-American system for protection of human rights and the expenses pertaining to said representation 67.aa) CEAPAZ represented the alleged victims and their next of kin before the Inter-American Commission, and for this it incurred a number of 60 See statement rendered on March 30, 2002 by Ricardo Samuel Gómez Quispe at El Callao (file with appendixes to the written brief containing pleadings, motions, and evidence, volume II, appendix 18, leaves 475 to 478). 61 See statement rendered on March 30, 2002 by Lucy Rosa Gómez Paquiyauri at El Callao (file with appendixes to the written brief containing pleadings, motions, and evidence, volume II, appendix 1, leaves 404 to 411). 62 See statement rendered on March 30, 2002 by Marcelina Haydée Gómez Paquiyauri at El Callao (file with appendixes to the written brief containing pleadings, motions, and evidence, volume II, appendix 14, leaves 469 and 470); and reminder of Mass on July 21, 1991 for Rafael Samuel and Emilio Moisés Gómez Paquiyauri, as well as for Jorge Javier, the baby lost by Marcelina Haydée Gómez Paquiyauri (file with appendixes to the written brief containing pleadings, motions, and evidence, volume II, appendix 16, leaves 471 and 472). 63 See statement rendered on March 30, 2002 by Marcelina Paquiyauri Illanes de Gómez at El Callao (file with appendixes to the written brief containing pleadings, motions, and evidence, volume II, appendix 10, leaves 449 to 457). 64 See statement rendered on March 30, 2002 by Lucy Rosa Gómez Paquiyauri at El Callao (file with appendixes to the written brief containing pleadings, motions, and evidence, volume II, appendix 1, leaves 404 to 411); statement rendered on March 30, 2002 by Marcelina Paquiyauri Illanes de Gómez at El Callao (file with appendixes to the written brief containing pleadings, motions, and evidence, volume II, appendix 10, leaves 449 to 457); and ruling of the investigative phase in the proceeding against Lucy Rosa Gómez Paquiyauri as a consequence of her detention on February 3, 1993 (file with appendixes to the written brief containing pleadings, motions, and evidence, volume II, appendix 6, leaves 420 to 429). 65 See testimony of Lucy Rosa Gómez Paquiyauri before the Court on May 5, 2004; testimony of Marcelina Paquiyauri Illanes de Gómez before the Court on May 5, 2004; testimony of Ricardo Samuel Gómez Quispe before the Court on May 5, 2004; testimony of Miguel Ángel Gómez Paquiyauri before the Court on May 6, 2004; expert opinion of Inge Genefke before the Court on May 6, 2004; and expert opinion rendered before a notary public by expert witness Bent Sorensen (evidence file before the Court, volume V, leaves 944 to 954).