taken to this end. In addition, the State must provide information on the way in which the said remains exhumed in “La Madre” have been handled,18 because the representatives have raised a series of objections in this regard (supra considering paragraph 15). Furthermore, the Court observes that, according to the representatives, the entity in charge of the search for Mr. Ibsen Peña, the Inter-institutional Council for the Clarification of Forced Disappearances (CIEDEF), has not been functioning since January 2012. Consequently, the State is requested to provide information on the operation of this entity and, if appropriate, with regard to any other entity that may be in charge of the search for the whereabouts of José Luis Ibsen Peña. C) Obligation to publish specific paragraphs of the Judgment in the Official Gazette, the official summary of the Judgment in a national newspaper with widespread circulation, and the complete Judgment on an appropriate website (tenth operative paragraph of the Judgment) 18. The State advised that, on November 15, 2010, it had published the paragraphs ordered in the Judgment in the State’s Official Gazette; that, on November 25, 2011, it had published the complete Judgment on the webpage of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and that, on January 16, 2013, it had published the official summary of the Judgment in the national newspaper, “El Diario.” 19. The representatives indicated that, although the State had complied with this measure of reparation, it had not made the publications ordered within the time frames established in the Judgment. 20. The Inter-American Commission stated that the obligation to publish the pertinent parts of the Judgment in the Official Gazette, as well as the complete text of the Judgment on an official website, had been fulfilled. In addition, in a brief of November 23, 2011, it recalled that the summary to be published in a national newspaper was the one “issued and notified by the Inter-American Court together with the Judgment and, consequently, it would be inappropriate to modify its content.” 21. The Court observes that the State forwarded, together with its briefs, a copy of the publication made on November 15, 2010, in the Official Gazette of the Plurinational State of Bolivia as established in the Judgment,19 and a copy of the publication of the official summary of the Judgment published on February 16, 2013, in the newspaper, “El Diario.”20 Furthermore, it provided the link to the publication of the Judgment on the webpage of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.21 Thus, taking into account the information presented by the parties and by the Commission, and the documentary support provided, the Court considers that the State has complied fully with the tenth operative paragraph of its Judgment.                                                              18 The representatives sent the Court a series of photographs of the remains found in the “La Madre” cemetery. However, based on these photographs, it is not possible to verify the assertions of the representatives about the presumed “mishandling,” public exhibition, and “lack of appropriate transfer” that these remains may have experienced. Cf. Photographs forwarded with the representatives’ brief of November 8, 2012 (file on monitoring compliance, tome I, folios 718 to 725). 19 Cf. Official Gazette of the Plurinational State of Bolivia, Special Edition No. 0132, November 12, 2010 (file on monitoring compliance, tome I, folio 135). 20 Cf. Copy of the official summary of the Judgment published in the newspaper “El Diario”; annex 1 to the State’s report of February 25, 2013 (file on monitoring compliance, tome II, folio 1120). 21 The Judgment is available at: http://www.rree.gob.bo/webmre/prensa//d387.pdf. Cf. Visit to the webpage of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (file on monitoring compliance, tome I, folio 217). 8