CEJIL

- Library
- Sign in

Previous 3 / 82 Next

Normal view

disputes concerning the agreement on reparations X. OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 233-239 240 3

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Uwazi is developed by
CEJIL
Library
Login

Info
20Relationships

Search Tips

Search text

Type something in the search box to get some results.

I INTRODUCTION TO THE CASE AND PURPOSE OF THE DISPUTE4
II PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT5
III PARTIAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITYAND ENDORSEMENT OF THE AGREEMENT ON REPARATIONS 7
IV COMPETENCE11
V PRIOR CONSIDERATIONS12
A) Regarding the preliminary objection 12
B) Regarding determination of the presumed victims13
VI EVIDENCE14
A) Documentary and testimonial evidence14
B) Admission of the evidence 15
B.1) Admission of the documentary evidence15
B.2) Admission of the statements of the presumed victims and of testimonial evidence16
VII FACTS17
A) General context17
B) The Diario Militar and the Historical Archive of the National Police19
B.1) TheDiario Militar19
B.2) The Historical Archive of the National Police20
C) The forced disappearance of Edgar Fernando García21
D) Search and investigation of the events24
E) The Grupo de Apoyo Mutuo30
VIII MERITS32
VIII-1 FORCED DISAPPEARANCE OF EDGAR FERNANDO GARCÍA 32
I. The forced disappearance of Edgar Fernando García32
A) Arguments of the Inter-American Commission and of the parties32
B) Considerations of the Court 33
II. The freedom of association and expression of Edgar Fernando García 40
VIII-2 OBLIGATION TO INVESTIGATE THE FORCED DISAPPEARANCE OFEDGAR FERNANDO GARCÍA 44
A) Arguments of the Inter-American Commission and of the parties44
B) Considerations of the Court2
1. Obligation to open an investigation ex officio48
2. Effectiveness of the remedy ofhabeas corpusand the special investigation procedure2
3. Due diligence in the investigations52
4. Reasonable time2
5. Conclusion 55
6. Alleged violation of the obligation to adopt domestic legal provisions andof the right of access to information55
VIII-3 ALLEGED VIOLATIONS TO THE DETRIMENT OF NINETH VARENCA MONTENGRO COTTOM, ALEJANDRA GARCÍA MONTENEGRO AND MARÍA EMILIA GARCÍA56
A) The right to personal integrity, the rights of the family, and the rights of the child57
B) The right to know the truth2
C) Freedom of association and of expression2
IX REPARATIONS (Application of Article 63(1) of the American Convention)66
A) Injured Party67
B) Obligation to investigate the facts that gave rise to the violations and to identify, prosecute and, as appropriate, punish those responsible, as well as to determine the whereabouts of the victim67
B.1) Obligation to investigate the facts, and to identify, prosecute and, as appropriate, punish the perpetrators and masterminds67
C) Measures of integral reparation:rehabilitation, satisfaction, guarantees of non-repetition69
C.1) Measures of Satisfaction69
C.1.a) Publication and dissemination of the Judgment69
C.1.b) Public act of acknowledgment of international responsibility69
C.1) Measures to commemorate and pay homage to the victim70
C.2.a) Construction of cultural and commemorative spaces to dignify the victims of human rights violations70
C.2.b) Naming a street after Edgar Fernando García71
C.2.c) Changing the name of a school to that of Edgar Fernando García71
C.2.d) Delivery of ten study grants to next of kin of disappeared persons71
C.3) Guarantee of non-repetition: National Commission for the Search for Victims of Forced Disappearances and other Forms of Disappearances 72
D) Compensation73
E) Costs and expenses74
F) Method of compliance with the agreed payments and resolution of possible disputes concerning the agreement on reparations75
X OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 76
# SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE EDUARDO VIO GROSSI79

García y familia. Judgment. November 29, 2012

IACourt judgment

Preview

Type

Costs
Merits
Reparations

Date: Nov 29, 2012

Mechanism

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Number: C-258

Country

Guatemala

Signatories

Alberto Pérez Pérez
Diego García-Sayán
Eduardo Vio Grossi
Leonardo A. Franco
Manuel E. Ventura Robles
Margarette May Macaulay
Rhadys Abreu Blondet

Primary Documents

García and family. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment. November 29, 2012.pdf
English
Download View
García y familiares. Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 29 de noviembre de 2012.pdf
Spanish
Download View

Supporting files

García and family. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment. November 29, 2012.doc702.46 kB

García y familiares. Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 29 de noviembre de 2012.doc631.3 kB

No References

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

País1
- Country1
Signatories6
- Judge and/or Commissioners6
Mecanismo1
- Mechanism1
Related to1
- Case1
IACourt Documents10
- Order of the IACourt7
- Order of the President IACHR1
- Hearing2
Separate Votes1
- Separate vote1

Create Reference

Select relationship type

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Search Tips

Notifications

You're all caught up

New activity will show up here.