7 21. The Commission noted the willingness of the State to implement the measure and hoped that it would translate into the implementation of outstanding obligations in the short term. 22. In light of the statements made by the parties, the President believes that the Court does not have sufficient information on the state of progress with the effective implementation of operative paragraph sixteen of the Judgment. Consequently, the President deemed it necessary that the Court have more information at its disposal on the measures taken to effectively comply with this reparation measure. a) Regarding operative paragraph seventeen of the Judgment 23. Regarding the obligation to install a plaque in memory of Jesús María Valle Jaramillo in the Palace of Justice, Department of Antioquia (operative paragraph seventeen of the Judgment), the State did not refer specifically to this point, but reiterated its willingness to comply as soon as possible with all the measures ordered by this Court, hence it is currently taking the necessary steps to achieve this goal. Consequently, it said that it will duly inform this Court on activities relating to the measure. 24. The representatives stated they are awaiting a response from the State regarding the proposed text for the plaque.5 The Commission noted the willingness of the State to implement this measure. 25. The President believes it is essential that the Court has specific information from the State concerning the installation of a plaque in memory of Jesús María Valle Jaramillo in the Palace of Justice, Department of Antioquia, in order to enable the Court to determine the state of compliance. a) Regarding operative paragraph eighteen of the Judgment 26. As for the obligation to provide any psychological and psychiatric treatment required by the victims, free of charge and immediately (eighteenth operative paragraph of the Judgment), the State did not refer specifically to this point, but expressed its willingness to comply as soon as possible with all the measures ordered by this Court. Consequently, it stated that it will duly inform this Court on diligences relating to this measure. 27. The representatives stated that neither the family of Mr. Valle Jaramillo nor the family of Carlos Fernando Jaramillo Correa "has received any physical or [p]sychological medical attention." Furthermore, it clarified that the two families 5 Representatives proposed the following text: JESÚS MARÍA VALLE JARAMILLO – IN MEMORIAM 1943-1998 Criminal lawyer, defender of the universal principles of due process and the right to a justice, true and courageous defender of human rights, murdered for his accurate reports on the coexistence of the National Army and the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC in Spanish). The Colombian State deeply regrets these facts, and apologizes to his family and society for the violation of human rights for which it was held responsible internationally by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights through a judgment issued on November 27, 2008. While admitting that nothing can heal the pain that his family has suffered, it hopes this plaque helps in the road to justice, to recognize, promote and protect the work of human rights defenders, with the hope that such acts never be repeated. Let this be a place to remember and to renew our commitment to defending human rights with his proclamation: "Here we are and will always, in the heat of battle or in the stillness of death."