8 have not been included in the program that the State has been implementing in other Colombian cases. Finally, regarding the Jaramillo Correa family, which resides in Canada as refugees, it maintained that the State "should create the conditions to ensure that, through the relevant Embassy or Consulate of Colombia, said family form an integral part of Colombia, and receive free, comprehensive and appropriate health care, equivalent to that received by other beneficiaries." 28. The Commission, meanwhile, stressed the need for the State to take appropriate steps to ensure that victims receive psychological and psychiatric treatment as soon as possible, given the nature of this reparation measure and the severity of the human rights violations involved in this case. 29. The President states that through an order of April 29, 2010 (supra Having Seen 3) the parties from different cases were convened to a private hearing on monitoring compliance with reparation measures on medical and psychological care stipulated in eight Colombian cases. Because of this, the President believes that operative paragraph eighteen of the Judgment will be monitored through the aforementioned joint monitoring of compliance. a) Regarding operative paragraph nineteen of the Judgment 30. With regard to the obligation to give Nelly Valle Jaramillo and Carlos Fernando Jaramillo Correa a scholarship to study or learn a trade (operative paragraph nineteen of the Judgment), the State expressed its willingness "to comply with this reparation measure and remedy, to some degree, the suffering and needs of Nelly María Valle Jaramillo and Carlos Fernando Jaramillo Correa." It stressed that through the Interpreting Judgment of July 7, 2009, the Court stated that "the fulfillment of this obligation [b]y the State implie[d], in part, that the beneficiaries [take] certain diligences to exercise their right [in] this reparation measure." Finally, it said it was alert and awaiting information from the beneficiaries on their desire to begin an academic program, so as to advance with the compliance of this measure. 31. Representatives noted that "neither [Mrs] Nelly Valle Jaramillo nor [Mr.] Carlos Fernando Jaramillo Correa, are in the physical or emotional conditions to initiate an academic training process." Also, they stated that they proposed to the State, after consultation with the beneficiaries, the one-time payment of a subsidy whose amount would be agreed upon, and whose base would be the sum of the average cost of tuition for 10 semesters of an undergraduate career at a private university in Bogota. 32. The Commission noted the willingness expressed by the State and said that it was awaiting observations from representatives of the victims. 33. In virtue of the decisions provided for in the Interpreting Judgment6 (supra Having Seen 2) and given the agreement that the State would reach with the 6 Under Title IX of the Interpreting Judgment, the Court ruled that: 35. Regarding the consultation about scholarships, [and] regarding the term in which the reparation measure must be met, [...] this Court notes that in paragraph 227(f) of the Judgment, the Court noted that the State pledged to "manage, after consultation with victims [Nelly Valle Jaramillo and Carlos Fernando Jaramillo Correa], a scholarship to be offered in Colombia for a course and study in the branch, profession and subject that the victims wish to study." Also, in paragraph 231 of the Judgment the Court accepted the aforementioned measure expressly offered by the State and in Operative Paragraph 19 it ordered that "a scholarship be awarded to Nelly Valle Jaramillo and Carlos Fernando Jaramillo Correa [...]