7 on merits issued by the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights. Long live the memory of María and Josefa!” c) payment of compensations for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages. In December of the year 2005 the State paid Q.2’000,000.00 (two million quetzales), equal to US $260,000.00 (two hundred and sixty thousand dollars of the United States of America). Said amount was distributed between six of the next of kin of María and Josefa Tiu Tojín, specifically: Josefa Tojín Imul, mother of María and grandmother of Josefa; Victoriana Tiu Tojín; Rosa Tiu Tojín, Pedro Tiu Tojín, Manuel Tiu Tojín, and Juana Tiu Tojín, all siblings of María.9 d) reimbursement of US $1,219.82 (one thousand two hundred and nineteen dollars of the United States of America with 82/100) to the representatives for the expenses and costs incurred in by them during the processing of this case before the Inter-American Commission.10 17. The Commission indicated in its application that the acknowledgment of the facts of the case and the international responsibility derived from the same, as well as the efforts made by the State to repair the victims during the processing of this case before said instance “has full effects with regard to the judicial proceedings currently being presented.” The representatives, on their part, indicated that said acknowledgment “has evidentiary consequences,” reason for which they requested that “it be included […] in the corresponding judgment.” 18. In its response to the application Guatemala stated that “from the content of the previously indicated agreement [we] can conclude that the State has not denied the existence of violations to the human rights of the [alleged] victims, on the contrary it acknowledged its responsibility for said violations and it undertook actions to grant the next of kin of the [alleged] victims a fair and adequate reparation, reasons for which it considers that the subject of the acknowledgment of responsibility was already complied with.” Likewise, the State acknowledged “the unjustified delay in the application of justice” and its deficiency in this matter, claim regarding which it stated its acquiescence. The State indicated it acknowledged its international responsibility “for having infringed Articles 4, 5, 7, 8, and 25 of the Convention in detriment of Mrs. María Tiu Tojín; Articles 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, and 25 in detriment of Josefa Tiu Tojín; and Articles 5, 8, and 25 in detriment of their next of kin, in relation to Article 1(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights and Article 1 of the Inter-American Convention on Forced Disappearance of Persons.” The State informed it continues making efforts to comply with the pending commitments in matters of reparations and asked the Tribunal that “the economic reparation agreed on and delivered in the present case be considered adequate and effective.” 19. In the course of the public hearing (supra para. 7) the State reiterated its acknowledgment of international responsibility and promised, inter alia, to offer information on the steps it would adopt to activate the transfer of the dossier of the present case from the Judge Advocate to the courts of the ordinary jurisdiction. Both 9 Cfr. copies of the administrative settlement records (dossier of annexes to the defendant’s plea, annex I, folios 2 through 19). Cfr. copies of the administrative settlement records (dossier of annexes to the defendant’s plea, annex II, folios 21 through 23) 10