6 and other students from educational institutions in Rabinal in which the victims actively participate.” 13. The Commission took note of the delivery of the translation of the American Convention in Maya-Achí, as well as the information presented by the representatives. In addition, it reiterated that “the obligation to disseminate information […] forms an important part of the reparation and, especially, regarding the prevention of violations and society's access to the truth” and that, therefore, it deemed it necessary to coordinate these obligations with the injured party, “so that they are fulfilled in accordance with the spirit of reparation that inspires them.” 14. The Court takes note of the measures taken by the State to comply with its obligation to translate the American Convention into Maya-Achí, its delivery to the victims and other persons present at the ceremony on October 30, 2009, as well as the delivery of the translations of the judgments in Spanish and Maya-Achí published on October 5 and 7, 2008, respectively, in a print media called “El Periódico”. In view of the information submitted by the State and the representatives, as well as the analysis of the documentation forwarded to that end, this Tribunal deems that the actions taken by the State in relation to operative paragraph in question comply with that set forth by the Court in its Judgment. In consequence, the Court considers that the State has complied with operative paragraph four of the Judgment. C) To provide free medical and psychological treatment, and medications, to any victims that need them (operative paragraph seven of the Judgment) 15. In its report of January 7, 2010, the State pointed out that the Ministry of Public Health and Social Welfare (hereinafter, “MSPAS”), since 2005 to the present, has been providing collective, family and individual medical and psychological treatment to the residents of the Plan de Sanchez village, and neighboring communities, through two psychologists and one nursing assistant. In this respect, it presented a report of the visits made between the months of September 2005 and April 2009 to the health center of Plan de Sanchez village. It further added that “in order to provide better service to the residents, the premises of the Health Center of Plan de Sanchez village and Joya de Ramos community were improved,” where a water tank and a font were installed. In addition, it mentioned that “even though this judgment orders the provision of psychological and medical treatment to the residents of [said] village and the neighboring communities, the State is obliged to provide this service pursuant to the Constitution of the Republic of Guatemala". Moreover, in a report of August 13, 2010, the State pointed out that on May 21, 2010, a meeting was conducted with officials from COPREDEH, where "[t]he attending officials proposed that the work of the Victims’ Physical and Mental Evaluation Committee be resumed so as [...] to provide them […] with the free medical treatment [and] medicine they require […]”. In that same meeting, the petitioners stated that MSPAS “did in fact […] built a Health Center in the Plan de Sanchez village […].” 16. In its observations of March 15, 2010, the representatives pointed out that the information furnished by the State in relation to the treatment provided is general, and this forms part of its constitutional obligations. In this respect, they mentioned that it is appropriate to take into account the particular and specific nature of the measure to repair a damage caused by the State to the population; therefore, a greater effort is required from the authorities and, in consequence, the Court cannot consider compliance based on the general information furnished. They further alleged that, in this specific case, it is necessary to “reduce the physical and psychological suffering of