4 11. The Secretariat’s notes of February 12, 2009 by means of which the requests made by the Judges at the end of said hearing were repeated. In particular, it was repeated to the State that it should present a written report, no later than March 2, 2009 regarding the compliance with the Judgment and the issues discussed during the hearing, including a schedule or calendar with the plan and term of the activities agreed upon in order to comply with operative paragraph six and seven of the Judgment. Furthermore, the State should inform, in relation to operative paragraph ten of the Judgment, on the reasons for the delay in the investigations. The representatives should present their observations within a term of 15 days, as of the receipt of the State's report. Moreover, the representatives were requested to clarify, in relation to the term to pay the compensatory amounts, whether the main reason for the disagreement is the distribution or the fact that the amounts ordered in the Judgment have not been paid. In addition, the Commission should forward the respective observations within a term of 15 days, as of receipt of the representatives’ observations. 12. The brief of March 6, 2009 by means of which the State forwarded additional information in response to the request made during the hearing (supra Having Seen clause 11). 13. The brief of April 16, 2009 by means of which the representatives forwarded, once the extension was granted, their observations to the State's report of March 6, 2009. 14. The brief of April 22, 2009 in which the State presented a “document of the agreements entered into in the meeting held on January 20, 2009 between the parties.” The following agreements were stipulated in said document: 1. Regarding the measure to search the mortal remains • • The Prosecutor undertook to present a search plan by April 30, 2009. Taking into account the discontent of the victims’ representatives with that date and the proposal made by them, the possibility of expediting the process will be analyzed, with the support of the Search Commission. 2. Regarding the measure to erect a monument • • Three pending administrative procedures (environmental permit, permit from the Planning Office and hiring of the artist) shall be followed before April 30, 2009. In February 2009, the State (represented by Carlos Franco and Margarita Rey, esq.) and the victim’s representatives (represented by Luz Marina Monzón, esq.) shall travel to Bucaramanga to meet with the Governor and the Mayor in order to request them to expedite the administrative procedures. 3. Regarding the measure to provide medical and psychological treatment Arteaga, Prosecutor of the Human Rights Unit of the Solicitor General’s Office; Generoso Hutchinson, Prosecutor of the Human Rights Unit of the Solicitor General 's Office; Ltn. Com. Enoc Salcedo, advisor to the Human Rights Division, Ministry of National Defense; Natalia Salamanca, advisor of the Human Rights Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Diana Bravo R, advisor of the Human Rights Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and General Jorge Rodríguez, Chief of the Joint Institutional Defense Office of the Military Forces; on behalf of the Inter-American Commission, Elizabeth Abi-Mershed, Deputy Executive Secretary; Juan Pablo Albán Alencastro, and Lilly Ching Soto, advisors; and on behalf of the victims’ representatives and of the next-of-kin and beneficiaries, Luz Marina Monzón, Gustavo Gallon Giraldo, Jahel Quiroga Carrillo, and María Victoria Fallón, of Colombian Jurists Commission [Comisión Colombiana de Juristas (CCJ)]; Michael Camilleri and Francisco Quintana, of the Center for Justice and International Law (CEJIL).