21 complying with this aspect of the Judgment as already mentioned, as long as the minors are able to withdraw the amounts they are entitled to, pursuant to the conditions established in paragraph 422 of the Judgment. Furthermore, it is important to point out that the State should inform and be aware of the date on which the corresponding minor becomes of age. In this regard, it seems pertinent to recall such paragraph, in the sense that “[i]f the compensation has not been claimed 10 years after each child has come of age, it shall revert to the State with the accrued interest”. 70. That the apparent dispute regarding paragraph 358 of the Judgment has been solved at the domestic level and therefore, it is irrelevant to issue a ruling in that regard in the instant case. 71. That based on the foregoing, the Court considers that the State has partially complied with its obligation to pay the compensations to the people mentioned in Appendixes I, II and III of the Judgment for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage. In order to be able to confirm full compliance with this obligation, the Tribunal requests the parties to present thorough, detailed and specific information on this matter (infra Operative Paragraph 2 and 3). * * * 72. That as to the reimbursement of the costs and expenses, the State pointed out that it ordered such payment by means of Resolutions 5898 and 2088. In addition, the representatives did not specifically refer to the compliance with this obligation, but they limited to mention that they received the total amount that the State ordered in such resolutions. In this regard, it spring from Resolution 2088 that the State ordered the payment of $33.817.397, 88 Colombian pesos (approximately, US$ 17.000,00 dollars of the United States of America) in favor of the Grupo Interdisciplinario por los Derechos Humanos and $18.035.945, 53 Colombian pesos (approximately US$ 9.000,00 dollars of the United States of America) in favor of the Comisión Colombiana de Juristas, as costs and expenses. Such sums include the accrued interest. Therefore, the Tribunal considers that the State has complied with this aspect of the Judgment. Therefore: The Inter-American Court of Human Rights, by virtue of its authority to monitor compliance with its own decisions, pursuant to Articles 33, 62(1), 62(3), 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, and Articles 25(1) of its Statute and 30(2) of its Rules of Procedure, Declares: 1. That in accordance with Considering clauses 50, 54 and 72 of this Order, the State has complied with the following obligations: