3 children; (ii) the establishment of a community center, that would be a women’s center, in the community of Barranca Tecoani; (iii) the adoption of measures to ensure that the girls of the community of Barranca Tecoani who attend school in the city of Ayutla de los Libres are provided with certain facilities so that they can continue receiving their education, and (iv) the payment of the amounts established for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, and costs and expenses. 5. The representatives based this condition on the possible increase in the lack of security and the risk to Mrs. Fernández Ortega, and to her family and her community, which would occur if “information [is provided] concerning the granting of a direct benefit of a monetary or other nature to the victims or their community […].” They stated that “the collective or community dimension of certain measures of reparation requires a process of communicating the measures, and their collective assessment and discussion in the communities. This process is being implemented […] and could be affected by the publication of determined aspects of [the judgment] and of certain measures of reparation.” Lastly, they emphasized that, if the Court finds that this request cannot be implemented as requested by Mrs. Fernández Ortega, “the Court should consider that [she] does not consent to the said publications being made.” 6. In this regard, the Court observes that the consent given by Mrs. Fernández Ortega for the implementation of the measures established in paragraph 247 of the judgment has been made conditional on partial publication; in other words, eliminating specific information that is unrelated to the object of the question raised by the Court, and that is not in keeping with the provisions of the judgment in the instant case. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Court notes that Mrs. Fernández Ortega has not consented to the said publications and, consequently, orders that this process of monitoring compliance with judgment be considered ended in relation to those measures of reparation. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercise of its authority to monitor compliance with its decisions under Articles 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, and 31(1) of its Rules of Procedure, DECLARES: 1. That, in accordance with the second and third considering paragraphs of this order, Mrs. Fernández Ortega has expressly given her consent for the State to implement the following measures established in the judgment: a) Publication of the results of the investigations and proceedings conducted by the State in the context of the instant case, and b) Broadcast by a radio station with coverage in Guerrero of the public act acknowledging international responsibility for the facts of the case. 2. That, as established in the fourth to sixth considering paragraphs of this order, Mrs. Fernández Ortega has not consented to the implementation of the following measures established in the judgment: