3 4. Violating the right to life and the right to humane treatment established in Articles 4(1), 5(1), and 19 (Rights of the Child) of the American Convention in conjunction with Article 1(1) of the same instrument to the detriment of the following minors: Marcos Neite (5), Erinson Olimpo Cárdenas (9), Ricardo Ramírez (11), Hilda Yuraime Barranco (14), Lida Barranca (8), Yeimi Viviana Contreras (17), Maryori Agudelo Flórez (17), Rosmira Daza Rojas (17), and Neftalí Neite (17). 5. Violating the right to property established in Article 21(1) and (2) of the American Convention in conjunction with Article 1(1) of the same instrument to the detriment of the victims, who were robbed of their belonging, and the survivors living in the Santo Domingo district, whose homes and belongings were destroyed or taken from them. 6. Violating the right to freedom of movement and residence established in Article 22(1) of the American Convention in conjunction with Article 1(1) of the same instrument to the detriment of those who moved away from the Santo Domingo district. 7. Violating the rights to a fair trial and to judicial protection established in Articles 8(1) and 25 of the American Convention in conjunction with Article 1(1) of the same instrument to the detriment of the victims wounded and the family members of the victims listed in Annex 1 to the Report on the Merits. 8. Violating the right to humane treatment established in Article 5(1) of the American Convention in conjunction with Article 1(1) of the same instrument to the detriment of the family members of the victims listed in Annex 1 to the Report on the Merits. With regard to the identification of the victims of the violations to the rights to freedom of movement and residence, and to property, because of the very nature of the facts of the case the Commission was unable to obtain accurate information that would enable it to specifically name all the victims of these violations. Given the intrinsic characteristics of the violations established, as well as the displacement and its consequences, the Commission gave special consideration in its merits report to the need to apply a broad understanding of the definition of victims, and to the need for the Colombian State to have a reparation measure that recognizes the community impact of the facts of the case. In this regard, the Commission informs the Court that in a communication submitted after the issuance of the merits report, the representatives of the victims: i) considered that the victims of the violation to the right enshrined in Article 22 of the American Convention are all of the inhabitants of Santo Domingo who, “on December 13, 1998 were obliged to abandon the town”; 1 and ii) specified other people as victims of violations to the rights to property, 2 to a fair trial, to judicial protection, and to mental and moral integrity. 3 1 See Appendix 1. File with the Commission. Communication from the petitioners of June 3, 2011. See Appendix 1.File with the Commission. Communication of the petitioners of June 3, 2011. CD attached. The victims of this violation named by the petitioners after the report on the merits was issued are: Nelcy Moreno Lizarazo, Irma Nelly Carrillo Mora, Nelcy Carrillo Mora, Marleni Carrillo Mora, Ana Mirian Duran 2 Continúa…