his nephews,” (iv) the “measures and steps taken in relation to claims and requests concerning Sebastián’s health, medical and psychological treatment, and access to social security,” and (v) the alleged “lack of judicial protection and deferment of compensation, and how this affected the life of his family.” B) Expert witnesses proposed by the representatives 1) María Laura Subies, who will testify about: (i) “decision mechanisms and practice of the courts in cases processed by courts with the same territorial and subject-matter jurisdiction as the court that intervened in the proceedings for damages as a result of Sebastian Furlan’s accident;” (ii) “the possibilities of public health care and social security coverage for children with disabilities,” and (iii) “the State’s response with regard to information on assistance,” and 2) Gustavo Daniel Moreno, who will testify about: (i) “the institution of the defender of children and those lacking legal capacity under Argentine law in the case law of the Supreme Court, and in the practice of the courts;” (ii) “the proceedings in which the said institution intervenes to protect economic, social and cultural rights, and its extra-judicial actions;” (iii) the “role of the Advisor for minors and those lacking legal capacity in light of the obligations of special protection imposed by the American Convention on Human Rights and the Convention on the Rights of the Child;” (iv) “civil and commercial proceedings under the domestic system of justice;” (v) “the decision-making powers of the judges under the procedural system;” (vi) when a case for damages can be considered complicated, and (vii) the usual time required to process such cases. C) 1) Expert witness proposed by the Commission Alejandro Morlachetti, who will testify about: (i) “the international standards for the judicial protection of children with disabilities and the special measures that must be taken when the result of a litigation relates to their right to personal integrity,” and (ii) “the application of these standards to the facts of the case.” 6. To require the State to facilitate the exit from and entrance to its territory of the deponents, if they reside or are in its territory, who have been summoned in this Order to testify at the public hearing on the preliminary objections and possible merits, reparations and costs in this case, in accordance with the provisions of Article 26(1) of the Court’s Rules of Procedure. 7. To require the representatives, the State, the Inter-American Commission, and the Secretariat of the Court to notify this Order to the persons they have proposed, and to the expert witness established ex officio by the President, respectively, who have been summoned to testify, in accordance with the provisions of Article 50(2) and 50(4) of the Rules of Procedure. 8. To inform the representatives and the Inter-American Commission that they must cover the costs of providing or producing the evidence they have proposed, in accordance with the provisions of Article 60 of the Rules of Procedure. To require the representatives and the expert witness, Hernán Gullco, convened ex 9. officio by the President, to forward to the Court an estimate of the cost of preparing an affidavit in Argentina and forwarding it to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, as well as the other vouchers for pertinent expenses, by February 7, 2012, at the latest. 12