2 9. The State shall pay Marcel Claude Reyes, Arturo Longton Guerrero and Sebastián Cox Urrejola, within one year, for costs and expenses, the amount established in paragraph 167 of [the] judgment, in the terms of paragraphs 167 and 169 to 172. […] 2. The order of compliance with Judgment issued by the Inter-American Court on May 2, 2008, in which it declared that: 1. That according to the terms of Considering clauses 11, 15 and 27 of [the] order, the State has fully complied with the operative paragraphs of the judgment in the instant case which ordered the State to: a) through the corresponding entity and within six months, provide the information requested by the victims, if appropriate, or adopt a justified decision in this regard, in the terms of paragraphs 157 to 159 and 168 of [the] judgment (Operative paragraph 5 of the judgment); b) publish, within a period of six months, once in the official gazette and in another newspaper with extensive national circulation, the chapter on the Proven Facts of [the] judgment, paragraphs 69 to 71, 73, 74, 77, 88 to 103, 117 to 123, 132 to 137 and 139 to 143 of [the] judgment, which correspond to Chapters VII and VIII on the violations declared by the Court, without the corresponding footnotes, and the operative paragraphs [t]hereof, in the terms of paragraphs 160 and 168 of [the] judgment (Operative paragraph 6 of the judgment); and c) pay Marcel Claude Reyes, Arturo Longton Guerrero and Sebastián Cox Urrejola, within one year, for costs and expenses, the amount established in paragraph 167 of [the] judgment, in the terms of paragraphs 167 and 169 to 172 (Operative paragraph 5 of the judgment). 2. That according to the terms of Considering clauses 19 and 23 of this order, the Court will hold open the procedure on compliance with the operative paragraphs of the judgment in the instant case in which it has ordered the State to: a) adopt, within a reasonable time, the necessary measures to ensure the right of access to State-held information, pursuant to the general obligation to adopt provisions of domestic law established in Article 2 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in the terms of paragraphs 161 to 163 and 168 of [the] judgment (Operative paragraph 7 of the judgment); and b) within a reasonable time, provide training to public entities, authorities and agents responsible for responding to requests for access to State-held information on the laws and regulations governing this right; this training should incorporate the parameters established in the Convention concerning restrictions to access to this information, in the terms of paragraphs 164, 165 and 168 of [the] judgment (Operative paragraph 8 of the judgment). AND DECIDE[D]: […]