CEJIL

- Library
- Sign in

Previous 62 / 67 Next

Normal view

Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary So ordered, Elizabeth Odio Benito President Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary 62

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Uwazi is developed by
CEJIL
Library
Login

Info
14Relationships

Search Tips

Search text

Type something in the search box to get some results.

I INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE AND PURPOSE OF THE DISPUTE4
II PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT5
III JURISDICTION8
IV PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS8
A. Exception regarding the alleged failure to comply with the exhaustion of domestic remedies and request for review of legality8
A.1. Arguments of the State and observations of the Commission and the representatives8
A.2. Considerations of the Court10
B. Exception on the alleged lack of jurisdiction of the Court to act as fourth instance12
B.1. Arguments of the State and observations of the Commission and the representatives12
B.2. Considerations of the Court13
C. Exception regarding the alleged improper inclusion of Article 26 of the Convention in the case of Walter Antonio Valenzuela Cerna, Jean Aubert Díaz Alvarado and Marta Silvana Rodríguez Ricse13
C.1 Arguments of the State and observations of the Commission and the representatives13
C.2 Considerations of the Court14
V PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS14
A. Factual Framework14
A.1 On the alleged improper inclusion in the pleadings and motions brief of allegations regarding the alleged impact on rights not included in the Admissibility Report No. 19/15, regarding Walter Antonio Valenzuela Cerna, Jean Aubert Díaz Alvarado and Marta Silvana Rodríguez Ricse14
A.2. On the alleged improper inclusion of facts and allegations proposed by the representatives of Walter Antonio Valenzuela Cerna15
A.3. On the two preliminary observations presented by the State16
VI EVIDENCE16
A. Admissibility of documental evidence16
B. Admissibility of the alleged victims’ statements, testimonial and expert evidence19
VII FACTS19
A. Relevant regulatory framework regarding the evaluation and ratification procedure of judges and prosecutors by the CNM19
B. On the process of evaluation and ratification of the alleged victims23
B.1 Regarding Jorge Luis Cuya Lavy23
B.2 Regarding Walter Antonio Valenzuela Cerna24
B.3 Regarding Jean Aubert Díaz Alvarado25
B.4. Regarding Marta Silvana Rodríguez Ricse26
VIII MERITS27
VIII-1 RIGHTS TO JUDICIAL GUARANTEES, RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND POLITICAL RIGHTS, IN RELATION TO THE OBLIGATIONS TO RESPECT AND GUARANTEE RIGHTS and DUTY TO ADOPT DOMESTIC LAW PROVISIONS OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION 10428
A. Arguments of the Commission and the parties28
A.1. Right to judicial guarantees, judicial independence, right to expect duly substantiated decisions and the principle of legality28
A.2. Regarding the right to know in advance and in detail the accusation made and to have adequate time and means to prepare a defense30
A.3. Political Rights31
B. Considerations of the Court32
B.1. The specific guarantees to safeguard the judicial independence of judges and their applicability to prosecutors due to the nature of the duties they undertake32
B.2. Duty to substantiate decisions35
B.3. Regarding the right to know in advance and in detail the accusation made and to have adequate time and means to prepare a defense39
B.4. Political rights40
C. Conclusion41
VIII-2 RIGHT TO JUDICIAL PROTECTION, IN RELATION TO THE OBLIGATIONS TO RESPECT AND GUARANTEE RIGHTS and THE DUTY TO ADOPT DOMESTIC LAW PROVISIONS OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION42
A. Arguments of the Commission and the parties42
B. Considerations of the Court43
C. Conclusion46
IX REPARATIONS46
A. Injured party47
B. Measures of restitution, satisfaction and guarantees of non-repetition47
B.1 Measures of restitution47
B.2 Measures of satisfaction49
C. Non-repetition measures49
D. Additional Measures51
E. Compensation52
E.1 Pecuniary Damage 18052
E.2 Non-pecuniary damage55
F. Costs and expenses56
G. Victims’ Legal Assistance Fund58
H. Method of complying with the payments ordered59
X OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS59
CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE VIO GROSSI63
CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE SIERRA PORTO65

Cuya Lavy y otros. Judgment. September 28, 2021

IACourt judgment

Preview

Type

Costs
Merits
Preliminary Objections
Reparations

Date: Sep 28, 2021

Mechanism

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Country

Peru

Signatories

Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot
Eduardo Vio Grossi
Elizabeth Odio Benito
Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Leoncio Patricio Pazmiño Freire
Ricardo C. Pérez Manrique

Separate vote

Eduardo Vio Grossi
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

Primary Documents

Cuya Lavy y otros. Judgment. September 28, 2021.pdf
English
Download View
Cuya Lavy y otros. Sentencia de 28 de septiembre de 2021.pdf
Spanish
Download View

Supporting files

Cuya Lavy y otros. Sentencia de 28 de septiembre de 2021.docx493.53 kB

No References

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

No Label1
- Case1
IACourt Documents5
- Order of the President IACHR1
- Hearing2
- IACourt judgment1
- Order of the IACourt1
Mecanismo1
- Mechanism1
País1
- Country1
Signatory Separate Vote1
- Judge and/or Commissioners1
Signatories3
- Judge and/or Commissioners3
Separate Votes2
- Separate vote2

Create Reference

Select relationship type

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Search Tips

Connect to a paragraph

Connect to an entity

Disable highlights

Add to table of contents

Notifications

You're all caught up

New activity will show up here.