RULING OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS * FEBRUARY 7, 2006 CASE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT (AGUIRRE ROCA, REY TERRY AND REVOREDO MARSANO) V. PERU COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT CONSIDERING: 1. The Judgment issued by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Court”, “the Inter-American Court”, or “the Tribunal”) on January 31, 2001, through which it: 1. [found] that the State violated the right to a fair trial embodied in Article 8 of the American Convention on Human Rights, with regard to Manuel Aguirre Roca, Guillermo Rey Terry and Delia Revoredo Marsano. 2. [found] that the State violated the right to judicial protection embodied in Article 25 of the American Convention on Human Rights, with regard to Manuel Aguirre Roca, Guillermo Rey Terry and Delia Revoredo Marsano. 3. [found] that the State failed to comply with the general obligation of Article 1(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, with regard to the violation of the substantive rights indicated in the previous operative paragraphs of the […] judgment. 4. decid[ed] that the State must order an investigation to determine the persons responsible for the human rights violations referred to in [the] judgment and also publish the results of this investigation and punish those responsible. 5. decid[ed] that the State [should] pay the amounts corresponding to the arrears of salary and other benefits that, by law, correspond[ed] to Manuel Aguirre Roca, Guillermo Rey Terry and Delia Revoredo Marsano […]. 6. decid[ed] that, in fairness, the State must reimburse the victims in the instant case, for costs and expenses […] the following amounts: Manuel Aguirre Roca, US$25,000.00 (twenty-five thousand United States dollars) or the equivalent in Peruvian money when the payment is made; Guillermo Rey Terry, US$25,000.00 (twenty-five thousand United States dollars) or the equivalent in Peruvian money when the payment is made; and Delia Revoredo Marsano, US$35,000.00 (thirty-five thousand United States dollars) or the equivalent in Peruvian money when the payment is made. 7. decid[ed] that it w[ould] monitor that th[e] judgment is complied with and only then w[ould] it close the case. * The Judge Diego García-Sayán informed the Court that, due to reasons of force majeure, he could not be present in the deliberation and signing of the present Ruling.