5 9. That, as regards to the fourth operative paragraph of the Judgment (supra Having Seen clause No. 1), which provides for the obligation to publicize the text of the Convention and the Court’s Judgments in the municipality of Rabinal and the obligation to provide a copy thereof to the victims in the instant case, the State expressed that, on paying the third installment, which was done on January 11, 2008, it provided each beneficiary with a copy of the “popular version” of the published Judgment, in MayaAchí and Spanish. It also stated that it had complied with its obligations to publish and publicize said judgments. Lastly, it reported that publication and publicizing of the text of the Convention in the Maya-Achí language was still pending (supra Having Seen clause No. 3). 10. That the representatives noted that the beneficiaries had welcomed said publication, notwithstanding which they had realized “[…] that said version […] does not conform to all of the relevant operative paragraphs.” Furthermore, they noted that the State has failed to publicize the Judgment in the Municipality of Rabinal and to publish the American Convention in the Maya-Achí language. Moreover, they stated that the State had failed to reply to their proposal regarding the method through which such texts should be disseminated, which included an audio version intended to allow access thereto by illiterate individuals (supra Having Seen clause No. 4). 11. That the Commission expressed its satisfaction with the provision of the text of the Judgments to the victims, noting that it was awaiting information regarding the publicizing of the Judgment in the Municipality of Rabinal. It also insisted on the importance “[…] of involving and consulting with the injured party regarding the most effective mechanisms for the reproduction and publicizing process […],” so that it is conducted in a manner that conforms to the spirit of the reparation ordered by the Court (supra Having Seen clause No. 5). 12. That, based on the information submitted by the parties and the analysis of the evidence presented, as regards to the dissemination of the Judgments on Merits and on Reparations, the Court notes that the State provided a document written in both the Maya-Achí and Spanish languages, providing an account of the context in which the massacre took place, as established in the Judgment on Merits, along with a summarized list of the proven facts and operative paragraphs Ns. 1 to 5 and 7 to 9 of the Judgment on Reparations. Consequently, the Court finds that, by publishing and delivering said documents to the victims, the State has disseminated the Judgments in the Municipality of Rabinal and partially complied with the fourth operative paragraph of the Judgment on Reparations. However, it urges the State, to the extent possible, to broadly disseminate said document in the Municipality of Rabinal, irrespective of the means used therefore, taking the meaning and scope of the Judgment into consideration. Moreover, the Court finds, as established in item (a) of the second operative paragraph of its Order of November 28, 2007, that the State has complied with its obligation to have the Convention translated into the Maya-Achí language. However, it should be noted that delivery of the American Convention to the victims and its dissemination in the Municipality of Rabinal are still pending, which necessarily requires that the State report to this Court on any progress made in complying with the related orders contained in the Judgment on Reparations. * * *