DECISION OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS JANUARY 27, 1993 PROVISIONAL MEASURES REQUESTED BY THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE MATTER OF PERÚ CHIPOCO CASE The Inter-American Court of Human Rights, composed of the following judges: Héctor Fix-Zamudio, President Sonia Picado-Sotela, Vice President Rafael Nieto-Navia, Judge Alejandro Montiel-Argüello, Judge Hernán Salgado-Pesantes, Judge Asdrúbal Aguiar-Aranguren, Judge also present, Manuel E. Ventura-Robles, Secretary, and Ana María Reina, Deputy Secretary adopts the following Decision: 1. On November 23, 1992, pursuant to Articles 63(2) of the American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter "the Convention" or "the American Convention") and 24 of the Rules of Procedure (hereinafter "the Rules") of the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights (hereinafter "the Court"), the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter "the Commission" or "the Inter-American Commission") submitted to the Court a request for provisional measures in Case 11.083 which is before the Commission and concerns Mr. Carlos Chipoco. 2. According to that communication, the Government of Perú has filed criminal charges against Mr. Carlos Chipoco before the 43rd Special Prosecutor of Lima for alleged "activities in support of subversion in the United States." Cause Nº 136-92 of the 43rd Criminal Court of Lima was opened as a "criminal proceedings against a group of Peruvians who reside or have traveled abroad, for allegedly committing the crime of justification of terrorism against the state." This cause was filed on the basis of a report of the Servicio de Inteligencia Nacional (National Intelligence Service) which mentions the names of several persons and institutions allegedly involved in "activities in support of subversion in the United States," among them Mr. Carlos Chipoco. The charges are founded upon various acts committed abroad such as "maintaining contacts with human rights organizations, with false information, in which they denigrate the Armed Forces and the Police and other State institutions related to the struggle against subversion." This report was adopted by the General

Select target paragraph3