7 v) Mr. Ramírez Rojas filed an appeal to annul said Judgment, but he had not been able to access a copy of the Judgment or the revision of the case file in the procedural term; vi) the criminal proceedings against Mr. Ramírez Rojas were joined with other proceedings without the necessary binding connection given that they emanated from completely different reports; vii) the District Attorney (“Fiscal Superior”) accused Mr. Ramírez Rojas of terrorism and for being part of the terrorist organization The Shining Path. This accusation was based on the validation of proof from the first criminal proceedings that was annulled as a result of the habeas corpus motion filed by his defense; viii) the facts which founded the prosecution of Mr. Ramírez Rojas contradict the facts considered proven by the Court regarding his detention and the police investigation, and ix) the evidence to which the National Chamber of Terrorism (“Sala Nacional de Terrorismo”) refers could not be used in a new case against Mr. Ramírez Rojas without violating the American Convention on Human Rights and ignoring the jurisprudence of the Court, since a substantiating element of the accusation can not be put forward if it has not been obtained under the minimal guarantees. 4. The communication presented by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Commission” or the “Inter-American Commission”) on May 16, 2007, whereby the Commission stated, inter alia: a) regarding the obligation to provide free medical and psychological care to Mr. Wilson García Asto through its health services, including the provision of free medicine, that it values the advances made to give Mr. García Asto medical and psychological attention and hopes that the State carries out the necessary actions to overcome the hurdles that have blocked the free provision of medicine; b) regarding the obligation to provide Mr. García Asto and Mr. Urcesino Ramírez Rojas the opportunity to have professional training and update, through the granting of scholarships, that the State should comply with this reparation in light of the interest manifested by the victims; c) regarding the obligation to pay, within one year, the amounts determined in the Judgment for compensation for material damages, immaterial damages, and costs and expenses, that the State has paid the amounts due with the exception of the pending payment of US$7,400.00 to Mr. Ramírez Rojas and the payment of compensation for Marcos Ramírez Rojas, who has reached the aged of majority and therefore it is no longer necessary to create a trust; d) regarding the obligation to publish in the Official Gazette and in another newspaper of nation-wide circulation, the relevant parts of the Judgment, that