4 duty to inform it on compliance with its decisions, the States Parties must promptly provide the Court with such information as is required by it.5 * * * 8. That the term within which to submit the first report on the status of compliance with the reparation measures ordered in the Judgment expired on August 3, 2008; that is, more than eight months ago. 9. That, through notes sent by the Court’s Secretariat, pursuant to instructions given by the President (supra Having Seen clauses No. 3 and 5), the State was reminded of its duty to report on the measures adopted to comply with this Judgment. 10. That the State has had an adequate and reasonable term within which to comply with its obligation to prepare and submit the first compliance report as ordered in the Judgment, and has even been granted a term extension by the Court to submit such report (supra Having Seen clause No. 5). 11. That, notwithstanding the foregoing, Perú has failed to inform of the status of compliance with the Judgment and has therefore failed to comply with its duty to inform. 12. That, in order to ensure the execution of the Judgment, this Court must be able to verify and have information about the implementation of the reparation measures ordered therein. Therefore, it is essential for the State to submit, without further delay, its first report on compliance with the reparation measures ordered by the Court in its Judgment. 13. That the Court will take into account the overall status of compliance with the Judgment once it receives Perú’s report as ordered and the observations of the victims’ representatives and of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. In the event of a new non-compliance by the State, the Court will assess the possibility of calling a hearing for monitoring compliance. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, pursuant to the authority to monitor compliance with its decisions, in conformity with Articlez 33, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, Articles 25(1) and 30 of its Statute, and Article 30 and 63 of its Rules of Procedure,6 5 General Assembly, Resolution AG/RES. 2292 (XXXVII-O/07) adopted in the fourth plenary session held on June 5, 2007, “Observations and Recommendations on the Annual Report of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights”. Rules adopted by the Court in its 49th Regular Session held from November 16 to 25, 2000, as partially amended during the 82nd Regular Session held from January 19 to 31, 2009, pursuant to Articles 71 and 72 thereof. 6