iii) Refrain from acts that could give rise to activities of third parties, acting with the State’s acquiescence or tolerance, that may affect the right to property or the integrity of the territory of the Kaliña and Lokono peoples, as established in the [Merits] Report; iv) Review, through effective and fully informed consultations with the Kaliña and Lokono peoples and their members that respect their customary law, the land titles, leasehold titles and long-term leases issued to non-indigenous persons, the terms of the mining activities authorized within the Wane Kreek Nature Reserve, and the terms of the establishment and management of the Wia Wia, Galibi, and Wane Kreek Nature Reserves, to determine the [respective] modifications that must be made in the[ir] terms to ensure respect for the property rights of the Kaliña and Lokono over their ancestral lands, territories and natural resources in accordance with their customs and traditions; v) Adopt all necessary measures, through effective and fully informed consultations with the Kaliña and Lokono peoples and their members that respect their customary law, to delimit, demarcate and grant collective title to the Kaliña and Lokono peoples over the lands and territories that they have traditionally occupied and used; vi) Adopt all necessary measures to approve, in accordance with Suriname’s constitutional procedures and the provisions of the American Convention, such legislative and other measures as may be needed to provide judicial protection and give effect to the collective and individual rights of the Kaliña and Lokono peoples in relation to the territory they have traditionally occupied and used, and vii) Redress, individually and collectively, the consequences of the violation of the aforementioned rights. In particular, consider the damage caused to the members of the Kaliña and Lokono peoples as a result of the failure to grant them legal title to their ancestral territory, as well as the damage caused to the territory by the acts of third parties. d) Notice to the State. The Merits Report was served upon the State on July 26, 2013; the latter was granted two months to report on compliance with the recommendations. e) Request for an extension and compliance report. On September 26, 2013, the State requested an extension in order to comply with the recommendations, and the Commission granted a further three months and required the State to present a report on any progress made by January 15, 2014. The State presented a report on that date, but failed to provide information on compliance with each recommendation. On January 24, 2014, the State requested a further extension without presenting additional information on compliance with the recommendations. f) Submission to the Court. On January 28, 2014, the Commission submitted this case to the Court’s jurisdiction, “owing to the need to obtain justice,” and in relation to all the facts and human rights violations described in the Merits Report.5 3. The Inter-American Commission’s requests. Based on the above, the Commission asked that the Court declare the international responsibility of the State for the violations described in its Merits Report and that it order the State, as measures of reparation, to comply with the recommendations set out in that document (supra para. 2.c). 5 The Commission appointed Commissioner José de Jesús Orozco Henríquez and Executive Secretary Emilio Álvarez Icaza as its delegates and Elizabeth Abi-Mershed, Deputy Executive Secretary, and Silvia Serrano Guzmán, lawyer of the IACHR Executive Secretariat, as legal advisers. 6