2 case fall within the temporal jurisdiction of the Court. In addition, Peru deposited the instrument of ratification of the Inter-American Convention on Forced Disappearance of Persons (IACFDP) on August 30, 2001. Although the detention of Jeremías Osorio Rivera occurred on April 28, 1991, the case-law of the inter-American system establishes that the effects of a forced disappearance are continuing, thus the obligations contained in the IACFDP subsist until such time as the whereabouts of the victim are determined, sanctions are meted out, and reparation is made. The Commission has designated Commissioner José de Jesús Orozco, and Executive Secretary Santiago A. Canton, as its delegates. Likewise, Elizabeth Abi-Mershed, Deputy Executive Secretary; Tatiana Gos and Daniel Cerqueira, attorneys of the Executive Secretariat of the IACHR, have been designated to serve as legal advisors. In accordance with Article 35 of the Rules of Procedure of the Inter-American Court, the Commission is enclosing with this communication a copy of Report 140/11 prepared in compliance with Article 50 of the American Convention, as well as a copy of the entire file before the Inter-American Commission (Appendix 1) and the annexes used in the preparation of Report 140/11 (Annexes). The Commission adopted Merits Report No. 140/11 on October 31, 2011, and transmitted it to the State on November 10, 2011; the State was given two months to report on the measures adopted to carry out the respective recommendations. On December 10, 2011, the petitioners presented a communication in which they state their reasons to justify their request for the case to be referred to the jurisdiction of the Inter-American Court. On January 11, 2012, the State presented a report its first report. On February 10, 2012 the State requested a two months extension and waived the right to allege that deadline before the Court. That same day the IACHR notified the State the granting of the extension. On March 21, 2012, the State presented its second report on compliance and requested a two months extension and waived the right to allege that deadline to the Court, in order to have more time to comply with the recommendations set out by the IACHR. On April 10, the IACHR notified the State the granting of the extension. On May 24, 2012 the State presented its third report on compliance and requested a third extension. However, taking into account the position of the petitioners and that the information provided by the State in three opportunities does not reveal substantial progress in complying with the recommendations set out, the Commission decided not to grant the extension requested and to submit the case to the jurisdiction of the Inter-American Court due to the need to obtain justice for the victims. In particular, as regards recommendations 1 and 2, related to determining the whereabouts of the victim, investigation, and punishment of the persons responsible for his forced disappearance, the Commission notes that the State merely reported that “at this time the criminal proceeding against the accused Juan Carlos Tello Delgado is going forward in the domestic jurisdiction for the crime against humanity – forced disappearance – to the detriment of Jeremías Osorio Rivera. This proceeding is before the Supreme Court of Justice, and the IACHR is aware of that fact.” In addition, the petitioners informed that “the motion has been declare admissible, but it is still pending the merits phase, after which the case will be elevated to the Supreme Court of Justice”. The Commission observes that, to date, there is no information as regards the results of the motion presented and that Peru did not clarify how long the criminal proceeding under way against the only member of the military indicted, Juan Carlos Tello Delgado, could last nor indicated what measures it has been taking to investigate all the persons responsible for the victim’s forced disappearance. The State did not present information with respect to the actions undertaken to determine the whereabouts of the victim. With respect to recommendation 3, related to reparation for the victim’s next-of-kin, the Commission notes that the State described the procedures and mechanisms of collective and individual reparations provided for in the National Reparations Plan. It stated that Law 28592 regulates that plan, and created the Single Registry of Victims, which includes the persons whose rights were impaired during the period of political violence in Peru from 1980 to 2000. It argued that on October 30, 2006 the