inquiry. Based on the foregoing, the Court decides not to continue monitoring compliance with this aspect. 15. With regard to the criminal investigation into the facts, the Court takes note of the fact that criminal charges were filed against an individual allegedly responsible; of the order of the Office of the Attorney General to give the processing of the case priority, and of the decision to hold a hearing on the investigation and prosecution on November 22, 2011. The Court recalls that more than 12 years have passed since Mr. Garibaldi’s death without the facts having been elucidated or those responsible punished. Taking these circumstances into account, Brazil must continue to take the necessary measures and steps to comply fully and effectively with this measure of reparation. In addition, within the time frame indicated in the fourth operative paragraph of this order, it must forward full and detailed information, including supporting documentation, on compliance with this obligation. b) Obligation to pay compensation for the damage and reimburse costs and expenses 16. With regard to the obligations to pay the compensation for pecuniary and nonpecuniary damage to the victim’s next of kin and to reimburse costs and expenses established, respectively, in the eighth and ninth operative paragraphs of the judgment, the State advised that the Human Rights Secretariat of the Presidency of the Republic had paid the amounts due to the victims by bank orders on March 16, 2011. It indicated that the payment was made by depositing the corresponding amounts in a current account indicated by the beneficiaries. It asked the Court to declare that the obligations established in the said operative paragraphs of the judgment had been fulfilled. 17. The Commission noted that the State had not presented information on the calculation of interest. 18. The representatives recognized that the State had “complied fully” with the payments of the compensation ordered in the judgment. 19. Based on the information provided by the State and the observation of the representatives concerning full compliance with the payments, the Court finds that the State has complied with these obligations ordered in the eighth and ninth operative paragraphs of the judgment. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercise of its authority to monitor compliance with its decisions, pursuant to Articles 33, 62(1), 62(3) and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, 25(1) of its Statute, and 31 and 69 of its Rules of Procedure, DECLARES THAT: 1. As indicated in considering paragraph 19 of this order, Brazil has complied fully with the obligations to pay the compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage to the victim’s next of kin and to reimburse costs and expenses established, respectively, in the eighth and ninth operative paragraphs of the judgment. 5