regarding those statements made by the State and the common intervener in said briefs, as well as those of the representatives in their brief of July 30, 2008, that refer to matters related to the supervision of compliance of the Judgment on merits, reparations, and costs, in what is relevant, will be considered by the Tribunal throughout the course of said proceedings, even when the Court may take note of the new information recently presented by the State regarding the reparation measure related to the monument “The Eye that Cries”, as well as of the observation of the common intervener, and it will make the considerations and rule as considered pertinent in the present Judgment (infra para. 57). II JURISDICTION AND COMPOSITION OF THE COURT 20. Article 67 of the Convention states that: [t]he judgment of the Court shall be final and not subject to appeal. In case of disagreement as to the meaning or scope of the judgment, the Court shall interpret it at the request of any of the parties, provided the request is made within ninety days from the date of notification of the judgment 21. Pursuant to the above-cited provision, the Court has jurisdiction to interpret its judgments. To carry out the exam of the request for interpretation and to decide what corresponds in this matter the Tribunal must, whenever possible, be composed of the same judges who delivered the corresponding judgment (Article 59(3) of the Rules of Procedure). On this occasion, the Court is composed of the judges who delivered the Judgment on merits, reparations, and costs, whose interpretation has been requested by the State and the representatives, with the previously mentioned modification (supra paras. 14 and 15).4 III ADMISSIBILITY 22. It corresponds to the Court to verify if the requests for interpretation comply with the norms applicable to this specific procedural supposition. Besides abovementioned Article 67 of the Convention, Article 59 of the Rules of Procedure states, in what is relevant, that: The request for interpretation, referred to in Article 67 of the Convention, may be made in connection with judgments on the merits or on reparations and shall be filed with the Secretariat. It shall state with precision 1. 4 Judge Oliver Jackman, who due to reasons of force majeure had not participated in the deliberation and signing of the Judgment on merits, reparations, and costs of November 25, 2006, passed away on January 25, 2007. 6