3 3. That the payment that the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ordered for the minor Micaela Suárez Ramadán in the judgment in question, sh[ould] be deposited in full in the trust fund mentioned in paragraph 107 of the judgment and that said amount sh[ould] not be subject to any tax at the time the trust fund is set up or to any tax withholdings. 4. That the attorneys for Mr. Suárez Rosero [were] to receive full and prompt payment of the costs and expenses that the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ordered in the judgment in question and that at time of payment, said amount sh[ould] not be subject to any deductions or taxes. 4. The brief of July 23, 1999, and its attachment, in which the State appointed “Ramón Jiménez Carbo […] to […] intervene as principal agent” in the case. 5. The brief of July 26, 1999, in which Alejandro Ponce Villacís, representative of the victim and his next of kin, referred to compliance by the State of Ecuador (hereinafter “the State” or “Ecuador”) with the provisions of the judgment on reparations, and also on the measures of reparation ordered in the judgment on merits. In this respect, he stated that the State had not conducted any type of investigation and had not punished any members of the Police who had taken part in the illegal detention of the victim, but, to the contrary, had proceeded to promote them within the police force. The representative added that the State had not complied with the fifth operative paragraph of the judgment on merits or with the payments established in the judgment on reparations, and it had not set up the trust fund ordered. Lastly, he indicated that he was not sure whether the name of Mr. Suárez Rosero had been eliminated from the Register of Criminal Records and, regarding the Register kept by the National Council on Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, he said that he believed that “the Court’s order ha[d] been complied with eventually, but he [was] not completely sure.” 6. Note CDH-11,273/268 of July 29, 1999, in which the Secretariat of the Court (hereinafter “the Secretariat”), on the instruction of the President of the Court (hereinafter “the President”), requested the State to present a report on compliance with the provisions of the judgment on reparations, and also on the measures of reparation ordered in the judgment on merits (supra first and second having seen paragraphs). 7. Note CDH-11,273/272 of September 1, 1999, in which the Secretariat, on the instructions of the President, reiterated to the State the request that it should present a report on compliance with the provisions of the judgment on reparations, and also on the measures of reparation ordered in the judgment on merits (supra first, second and sixth having seen paragraphs). 8. The brief of November 12, 1999, and its attachments, in which the State presented the report that had been requested (supra sixth and seventh having seen paragraphs). In this respect, it indicated that the “Public Prosecutor [...] had order[ed] the respective Criminal Judge of Pichincha to [initiate] criminal proceedings in order to discover the authors, accomplices and accessories of the human rights violations against Mr. Suárez Rosero.” 9. The brief of December 15, 1999, and its attachment, in which Alejandro Ponce Villacís transmitted a copy of the communication of December 2, 1999, that he had sent to Ramón Jiménez Carbo, Attorney General of the State of Ecuador concerning the payment of the professional fees ordered in the judgment on