2 […] 12. If the State should delay payment, it must pay interest on the amount owed, corresponding to banking interest on arrears in Paraguay. […] 2. The orders on monitoring compliance with judgment, delivered by the Court on February 2, 2006 and September 22, 2006. In the latter, the Court: DECLARE[D]: 1. That in accordance with the provisions of Considering clauses No. 8, 10 and 12 of th[e …] Order, the State has not fulfilled the obligations contained in the operative paragraphs of the judgment on the merits, reparations and costs, issued by the Tribunal on August 31, 2004. AND DECIDE[D|: 1. To require the State to adopt the necessary measures to comply promptly and effectively with the decisions of the Court in the judgment on merits, reparations and costs of August 31, 2004, that are pending fulfillment, pursuant to the provisions of Article 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights. […] 3. The October 13, 2006 brief filed by the representatives of the victim (hereinafter "the representatives"), commenting on the State's September 13, 2006 report and asking the Court to "urge the State of Paraguay to act with the greatest of urgency to comply with reparations ordered by the […] Court." 4. The November 1, 2006 brief filed by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter "the Inter-American Commission" or "the Commission"), stating that it was "awaiting full, up-to-date information from the State" on measures adopted to comply with the judgment delivered in the instant case. 5. The November 16, 2006 communication by the State of Paraguay (hereinafter "the State" or "Paraguay"), reporting that "the appropriate agencies are taking all necessary measures to comply with the terms of the August 31, 2004 judgment." 6. The February 14, 2007 note by which the Secretary of the Court, on instructions from the President of the Court, reminded the State that November 30, 2006 had been the final date for it to file its report on compliance with the judgment,