6 (Operative Paragraph 8 of the judgment), the Court notes that the State submitted copies of both the March 14, 2007 publication in its Official Gazette, and the January 30, 2008 notice published in the nationally read newspaper "La Nación." 11. That in the hearing, a representative of the victim verified that the State had published the relevant section of the judgment, both in the Official Gazette and in another nationally read newspaper, but commented that the State had been slow to comply with these obligations. 12. That the Inter-American Commission acknowledged the willingness of the State to comply with pending items ordered in the judgment for this case. 13. That the Court notes that, according to Operative Paragraph 9 of the judgment and based on the date when notification was made, the deadline for complying with the obligation to publish the relevant sections of the judgment expired on March 16, 2005 (supra Considering clause 9). Nevertheless, the Court feels that these publications constitute compliance with the terms of Operative Paragraph 8 of the judgment. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: by virtue of its authority to monitor compliance with its own decisions pursuant to Articles 33, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, Articles 25(1) and 30 of its Statute, and Article 29(2) of its Rules of Procedure, DECLARES, 1. That in view of the provisions of Considering clauses 4 and 13 of this Order, the State has fully complied with the following measures of redress: a) pay compensation and reparations ordered for non-pecuniary damage and for costs and expenses (Operative Paragraphs 6 and 7 of the judgment), except insofar as they entail payment of overdue interest, in accordance with the provisions of Operative Paragraph 12 of the judgment, and b) publish in the Official Gazette and another newsaper of nationwide